|
Post by bertrus2 on Jan 15, 2009 0:39:06 GMT
tinyurl.com/98w9dyWho wouldn't be an Israel sympathizer after hearing what these nice people have to say?
|
|
|
Post by newyorker on Jan 15, 2009 1:16:10 GMT
Aren't they cool, my people. Love them big ups!
|
|
|
Post by newyorker on Jan 15, 2009 1:20:25 GMT
Yeah, my Homies!
|
|
|
Post by newyorker on Jan 15, 2009 1:25:06 GMT
Good thread topic Berty.
|
|
|
Post by omnipleasant on Jan 15, 2009 1:25:06 GMT
Racist cnuts.
I'm so glad the US have elected a decent president. Bring it on.
|
|
|
Post by newyorker on Jan 15, 2009 1:29:44 GMT
Racist cnuts. I'm so glad the US have elected a decent president. Bring it on. Aw, Omni feels left out. Here's your people, feel better now?
|
|
|
Post by newyorker on Jan 15, 2009 1:33:51 GMT
My People! I f**kin' Love You! USA and NYC for Israel!
|
|
reef
New Member
Posts: 22
|
Post by reef on Jan 15, 2009 10:01:29 GMT
They're frikkin' nuts.
|
|
|
Post by bertrus2 on Jan 15, 2009 15:02:44 GMT
You don't want to be on the side of the ugly people, whether they are pro or anti Israel. The ugliness is in their hearts and minds however they look physically.
|
|
|
Post by bertrus2 on Jan 15, 2009 15:05:31 GMT
Granted New York is in a Jewish homeland, but how do you explain any American goys at the pro-Israel demonstration?
|
|
|
Post by cobblers on Jan 15, 2009 15:09:26 GMT
No, your ugliness is in your heart Bertrus. You are a hypocrite and a shill for Islamic fundamentalism. You say nothing about Darfur, while denying Israel the right to defend against people wjho deliberately use their civilans population to hide behind as they launch attacks on other civilians.
It is clear the people who deliberately implicate civilians is Hamas and Islamic terror worldwide. You are evil scum.
What is the worst comment you can find in the video you posted up? Then we can compare it with the worst acts and statements of the anti-Israel 'protestors'
Should be interesting...
|
|
|
Post by bertrus2 on Jan 15, 2009 15:18:41 GMT
"You say nothing about Darfur"
The International Criminal Court has warrants out for arrests in connection with Darfur crimes. If you consult the ICC website, you will see that it is active in a number of cases. In due course,prosecutions may be brought forward in relation to atrocities committed in Gaza. Owing to the stranglehold of the US on the Security Council, there is no likelihood of this coming through the ICC. The principle of universal jurisdiction allows any state to initiate proceedings. Iran, perhaps?
|
|
|
Post by cobblers on Jan 15, 2009 15:25:35 GMT
Due to the voting power of the OIC within the UN the UN does nothing in Darfur. You say nothing about Darfur where the deatrh toll is 200,000.
You prefer to attack Israel and the Jews.
By the way, will you take up my challenge? Find the worst comment you can in the video you posted up and I will do the same from one of the Pro-Hamas demonstrations.
Should be enlightening.
|
|
|
Post by Victor Meldrew on Jan 15, 2009 15:30:44 GMT
The principle of universal jurisdiction allows any state to initiate proceedings. Iran, perhaps?
Is that the latest 'news' report from your favourite Press TV, Bert?
You really should start watching proper news channels.
|
|
|
Post by cobblers on Jan 15, 2009 15:32:30 GMT
Victor, have I seen you somehwere before?
|
|
|
Post by Victor Meldrew on Jan 15, 2009 15:40:00 GMT
Ooh, I doubt it, Cobbs. But then, I don't know if I've seen you before, so I don't know who you are. Therefore, I can't really say if you've seen me before. I need a lie down, now. This is all far too complex for us grumpy old men to stand.
|
|
|
Post by cobblers on Jan 15, 2009 15:43:32 GMT
You're not from News then? Where's Muz?
|
|
|
Post by bertrus2 on Jan 15, 2009 16:07:28 GMT
"You say nothing about Darfur where the deatrh toll is 200,000."
The International Criminal Court has warrants out for arrests in connection with Darfur crimes.
|
|
|
Post by reverend on Jan 15, 2009 16:08:52 GMT
the international criminal court is a farce!
|
|
|
Post by bertrus2 on Jan 15, 2009 16:19:33 GMT
"the international criminal court is a farce! "
Why do you say that? Its current cases include DR Congo, Uganda, Central African Republic and Darfur. Wouldn't it be a good thing to bring prosecutions in relation to the current situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territories? Granted, nothing will come of it in the forseeable future, but it's reasonable to work in that direction rather than standing idly by or actually condoning atrocities.
|
|