sweet soul
New Member
Keep The Faith !
Posts: 5,106 
|
Post by sweet soul on Jan 22, 2009 20:43:49 GMT
Not a full shilling ( for 1 star )
Half baked ( 2 star )
Full shilling ( 3 star )
|
|
|
|
Post by reverend on Jan 22, 2009 22:48:44 GMT
how about--
cluless
dumbass
daft
dim
nuts
loopy
deranged
confused
sensible
wise
intelligent
rocket scientist
video recorder programmer
|
|
|
|
Post by Beachcomber on Jan 22, 2009 23:06:50 GMT
Beachcomber wrote .....
I've voted for 'Get rid Altogether' The star ranking adds nothing to the site and encourages pointless posts. Does anyone really care how often a particular member has contributed ?
(If there was a ranking for 'Quality of Posts' I may change my mind)
Feral wrote ......
LOL.That's what I voted for as well .For exactly the same reasons
(I'm gonna keep re-posting 'till someone listens)
|
|
sushimo
New Member
One tequilla, Two Tequilla, Three Tequilla - Floor.
Posts: 243
|
Post by sushimo on Jan 22, 2009 23:33:39 GMT
Give everyone 10 stars to begin with, then deduct 1 each time they break the forum rules  , or if they post drivel  . |
|
|
|
Post by Foxy on Jan 23, 2009 0:10:39 GMT
hehe - we'd all be in minus stars in no time!
|
|
KrispyKoala
New Member
We've gone Global? Do I need shots for that?
Posts: 1,694 
|
Post by KrispyKoala on Jan 23, 2009 1:25:24 GMT
Stop picking on Vania  |
|
|
|
Post by tedward on Jan 23, 2009 9:12:36 GMT
Nothing at all, ever.
Time for Clunk to go.
|
|
SKYBLUE
New Member
:) SMILE! ...and deny all liability!
Posts: 255
|
Post by SKYBLUE on Jan 23, 2009 14:40:53 GMT
How about appointing letters! Loads of funny countdown possiblilties A S R E H O L E  |
|
|
|
Post by lawrence on Jan 23, 2009 18:37:04 GMT
I agree , ditch them.
|
|
|
|
Post by cathy on Jan 23, 2009 22:02:49 GMT
I agree with Beachy. Can't see much point in having stars. All it does is show everyone here that someone with only one or two stars is either new or an occasional visitor. Is that fair? Isn't it discriminatory?  Nah, after we've been here awhile we get to know whose who and whose new so I can't see the need to emphasise the point. |
|
|
|
Post by Libby on Jan 24, 2009 17:49:08 GMT
I'm in agreement with you there Cathy! Some people are able to pop in more often so the stars are easier to get, others can't make it because of work commitments etc. Once everyone gets to know each other the stars aren't really necessary. We all know who the new members are when they come in anyway. Ditch them i say!  |
|
feral
New Member
Posts: 8,237
|
Post by feral on Jan 24, 2009 17:51:20 GMT
It's a bit harsh just to ditch the new members isnt it ?  |
|
|
|
Post by saddamy on Jan 24, 2009 17:55:31 GMT
ditch t-shirt wearers then ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Beachcomber on Jan 24, 2009 17:57:11 GMT
......... or, just post the pic minus a tee shirt ! |
|
|
|
Post by saddamy on Jan 24, 2009 17:58:04 GMT
even better idea |
|
|
|
Post by Beachcomber on Jan 24, 2009 18:01:24 GMT
C'mon Feral ....... you know you want to !  |
|
feral
New Member
Posts: 8,237
|
Post by feral on Jan 24, 2009 19:44:53 GMT
naaaa ...I think its far more fum to keep you wondering |
|
|
|
Post by Libby on Jan 24, 2009 20:02:56 GMT
It's a bit harsh just to ditch the new members isnt it ? I meant ditch the stars feral, not the new members! lol! |
|
feral
New Member
Posts: 8,237
|
Post by feral on Jan 24, 2009 21:35:06 GMT
I know you did but I'm a pedantic bugger |
|
|
|
Post by Libby on Jan 24, 2009 23:27:26 GMT
Thank goodness you kept your t-shirt on to reply feral lol! |
|
