|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jul 21, 2024 20:58:55 GMT
Good for her. I discovered some years back that an acquaintance of mine’s parents’ submitted her to FGM. I always found her to be such a miserable women. I guess I eventually learned why she was that way. |
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jul 21, 2024 20:59:52 GMT
Talking of useless lumps .... www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c725x5351vxoLook, #fuckofflove, if you didn't know that you were having unprotected sex at 15, you've neatly demonstrated how thick you are and how badly served you were by the education system. Also, how old was the "adult man"? Betcha he was 18 or so, and you fancied him rotten. The Bear supports grooming and rape of a minor. Figures. Maybe she will reveal the man is of South Asian descent and you can suddenly change your mind…. (It’s also not beyond the realm of possibility that a 15 year old is ignorance of family planning and safe sex. She was a child and without parental and/ or school education how would she be any the wiser.) |
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Jul 21, 2024 21:17:52 GMT
"Supports"?
Are you mental?
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Jul 21, 2024 21:18:38 GMT
Good for her. I discovered some years back that an acquaintance of mine’s parents submitted her to FGM. I always found her to be such a miserable women. I guess I eventually learned why she was that way. She was acquainted with you? |
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jul 21, 2024 21:34:41 GMT
"Supports"? Are you mental? It’s clear in your post - and it’s not the first time you have been pro-rape. Imagine referring to a rape victim as simply “fancying her attacker”. Embarrassing. |
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Jul 22, 2024 5:53:33 GMT
Don't be a goon. She herself says she was a willing participant and that the rape was statutory. She wasn't attacked.
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Jul 22, 2024 6:17:02 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Jul 22, 2024 13:46:23 GMT
Don't be a goon. She herself says she was a willing participant and that the rape was statutory. She wasn't attacked. “Willing”? Hmm. Interesting interpretation of the law on consent. At what age do you think a child can’t be “willing”? What level of persuasion and grooming by the adult is acceptable? |
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Jul 22, 2024 13:46:34 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Jul 22, 2024 13:51:15 GMT
"His other 32 killings are still classified as “justifiable homicides” by the police. Apartheid-era laws gave people the right to use lethal force against intruders if they resisted arrest or fled once caught." It's also post-apartheid law in RSA. Simple research. |
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jul 22, 2024 16:20:47 GMT
Don't be a goon. She herself says she was a willing participant and that the rape was statutory. She wasn't attacked. You describe a groomed young girl as a “willing participant” in her own rape. There must be some pretty horrendous skeletons in your closet. Imagine defending rape like this because the victim was groomed. And she was attacked if her assailant was grooming her. Embarrassing. |
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jul 22, 2024 16:22:34 GMT
I read the title and thought “wtf”?
I then kept reading and it all made sense.
“A convicted South African murderer who shot dead dozens of black men during apartheid has told the BBC the police sanctioned his violence. Louis van Schoor says others should share the blame for the killings he carried out as a security guard. But in talking to BBC Africa Eye over the past four years, he has also let slip horrifying details that raise serious questions about his early release from prison.”….
A violently racist white South African.
Shocking.
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Jul 22, 2024 16:23:45 GMT
Don't be a goon. She herself says she was a willing participant and that the rape was statutory. She wasn't attacked. You describe a groomed young girl as a “willing participant” in her own rape. There must be some pretty horrendous skeletons in your closet. Imagine defending rape like this because the victim was groomed. Embarrassing. All made up. Do you remember what we talked about? |
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Jul 22, 2024 16:25:25 GMT
I read the title and thought “wtf”? I then kept reading and it all made sense. “A convicted South African murderer who shot dead dozens of black men during apartheid has told the BBC the police sanctioned his violence. Louis van Schoor says others should share the blame for the killings he carried out as a security guard. But in talking to BBC Africa Eye over the past four years, he has also let slip horrifying details that raise serious questions about his early release from prison.”…. A violently racist white South African. Shocking. I wonder what he was actually convicted for, given the law as it stood, and stands, in respect of shooting wrong uns. |
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jul 22, 2024 16:25:53 GMT
Oh I missed it before it’s because she is a Labour MP.
So in the pro-rape Bear’s eyes, her being groomed and raped becomes ok.
|
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jul 22, 2024 16:27:05 GMT
I read the title and thought “wtf”? I then kept reading and it all made sense. “A convicted South African murderer who shot dead dozens of black men during apartheid has told the BBC the police sanctioned his violence. Louis van Schoor says others should share the blame for the killings he carried out as a security guard. But in talking to BBC Africa Eye over the past four years, he has also let slip horrifying details that raise serious questions about his early release from prison.”…. A violently racist white South African. Shocking. I wonder what he was actually convicted for, given the law as it stood, and stands, in respect of shooting wrong uns. Whatever it was it was only 12 years for 7 killings. |
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Jul 22, 2024 16:31:28 GMT
I wonder what he was actually convicted for, given the law as it stood, and stands, in respect of shooting wrong uns. Whatever it was it was only 12 years for 7 killings. From what we know, that's 12 years too many. |
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Jul 22, 2024 16:31:51 GMT
Oh I missed it before it’s because she is a Labour MP. So in the pro-rape Bear’s eyes, her being groomed and raped becomes ok. More made-uppity. |
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jul 22, 2024 16:34:10 GMT
“Willing participant”. “Grooming is when a person builds a relationship with a child, young person or an adult who's at risk so they can abuse them and manipulate them into doing things. The abuse is usually sexual or financial, but it can also include other illegal acts.” “Report it Grooming is an offence. If you suspect a person is being groomed, even if you’re not sure, please tell someone. If you think you're being groomed, you should tell someone.” www.met.police.uk/advice/advice-and-information/gr/grooming/ |
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jul 22, 2024 16:37:48 GMT
“What is grooming?
Grooming is when someone builds a relationship, trust and emotional connection with a child or young person so they can manipulate, exploit and abuse them.
Children and young people who are groomed can be sexually abused, exploited or trafficked.
Anybody can be a groomer, no matter their age, gender or race. Grooming can take place over a short or long period of time – from weeks to years. Groomers may also build a relationship with the young person's family or friends to make them seem trustworthy or authoritative.”
“Effects of grooming
Grooming can have both short and long-term effects. The impact of grooming can last a lifetime, no matter whether it happened in person, online or both.
A child or young person might have difficulty sleeping, be anxious or struggle to concentrate or cope with school work. They may become withdrawn, uncommunicative and angry or upset.
Children, young people and adults may live with:
anxiety and depression
eating disorders
post-traumatic stress
difficulty coping with stress
self-harm
suicidal thoughts
sexually transmitted infections
pregnancy
feelings of shame and guilt
drug and alcohol problems
relationship problems with family, friends and partners.
Our services can support children and young people who have experienced grooming to help them move on and receive the care they need.”
“Willing participant”
|
|
