Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2019 14:18:28 GMT
Hush FA, you'll be squealed at.
|
|
|
|
Post by reverend on Jul 21, 2019 14:23:49 GMT
Of course, BDS shouldn't be condemned. It is not anti-semitic. BDS is a perfectly reasonable tactic considering Israel's vicious and racist behaviour in Palestine. Except the Democrats condemned BDS as anti Semitic, your out of step with your party! |
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Jul 21, 2019 14:26:01 GMT
You mean Democratic leadership who have constituencies with very large Jewish populations and who've taken a whole lot of campaign money from Israel-linked organisations, and who remain petrified of criticising even Netanyahu's leadership despite Netanyahu aligning with actual fascists like Orban.
|
|
|
|
Post by jimboky on Jul 21, 2019 14:29:56 GMT
that's it!!
it's called politics, they are trying to be for and against the same thing,
|
|
|
|
Post by reverend on Jul 21, 2019 14:34:03 GMT
You mean Democratic leadership who have constituencies with very large Jewish populations and who've taken a whole lot of campaign money from Israel-linked organisations, and who remain petrified of criticising even Netanyahu's leadership despite Netanyahu aligning with actual fascists like Orban. Yeah maybe you should vote republican! Can we take it then your fully on board with the squad? |
|
|
|
Post by jimboky on Jul 21, 2019 15:06:56 GMT
I wouldn't think Andy could vote, though it is California, who knows?
|
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Jul 21, 2019 22:14:01 GMT
You mean Democratic leadership who have constituencies with very large Jewish populations and who've taken a whole lot of campaign money from Israel-linked organisations, and who remain petrified of criticising even Netanyahu's leadership despite Netanyahu aligning with actual fascists like Orban. Yeah maybe you should vote republican! Can we take it then your fully on board with the squad? I'm not fully on board with anyone. I'm closest, probably, to Buttigieg. "The Squad" are to the left of me, but the idea that they're deranged extremists is complete nonsense. The Democratic leadership aren't as bad as The Squad claim, but they're obviously flawed and obviously still informed by thinking from the 80s and 90s, still sticking to old fashioned ideas... |
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jul 21, 2019 23:55:26 GMT
I saw them both but once again the focus was heavily on Israel and pro-Israel groups. I mean I don’t care about Israel particularly and have been there on holiday - but you appear to be doing what you criticised the squad of doing - raising ethnicity to stave off criticism. You seem to be confusing my comments about what is being reported and my opinions, I'm not making any judgments I'm relaying what I have read, the republicans are calling her anti Semitic and she is giving them the ammunition to do so, she has apologised publicly for these kind of comments, the dems condemn BDS in the house as anti Semitic and then as soon as she is in the spotlight she tables a BDS motion after pledging not to during her campaign, and now the dems can't condemn it after defending her! Put your partisanship to bed and even you can see this is all kinds of dumb, trump is going to make the next election about patriotism versus anti Americanism, Pelosi has a real problem with these four, that is if Pelosi survives, which I'm not convinced she will! Well you’re not just relaying what you heard. You provided articles as “proof” of her anti-semitism yet they all are about her stance on Israel. So you are mirroring what you have accused the squad of doing. |
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jul 21, 2019 23:58:12 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by reverend on Jul 22, 2019 13:25:37 GMT
You seem to be confusing my comments about what is being reported and my opinions, I'm not making any judgments I'm relaying what I have read, the republicans are calling her anti Semitic and she is giving them the ammunition to do so, she has apologised publicly for these kind of comments, the dems condemn BDS in the house as anti Semitic and then as soon as she is in the spotlight she tables a BDS motion after pledging not to during her campaign, and now the dems can't condemn it after defending her! Put your partisanship to bed and even you can see this is all kinds of dumb, trump is going to make the next election about patriotism versus anti Americanism, Pelosi has a real problem with these four, that is if Pelosi survives, which I'm not convinced she will! Well you’re not just relaying what you heard. You provided articles as “proof” of her anti-semitism yet they all are about her stance on Israel. So you are mirroring what you have accused the squad of doing. I am very much relaying what I have heard, your not grasping this, the republicans are claiming she is anti Semitic not me, I am commenting on the political damage for the democrats which Pelosi is trying to mitigate, you asked for links I put up a few random ones, how you interpret them is up to you, but to the republicans she is anti Semitic, a notion reinforced by her actions in the house! You missed the bit where she apologised by the way. |
|
|
|
Post by reverend on Jul 22, 2019 13:38:30 GMT
Pelosi's comments to the four are about their policy not their criticism of the leadership, and it's the Squad that is making this about race, no one else, this is race card playing at it's worst, Pelosi makes no reference or implication of race so to even bring it into the debate is clearly wrong! The link above shows 30% of democrats think it is racist for whites to criticise the politics of non whites, that's bollox and racist all by itself, as it seems it is perfectly ok for non whites to criticise whites, double standards, this whole notion is anti white racism! Twice Pelosi has been reminded she is criticising "women of colour" what else is there to read from that other than you have no right to criticise us as any criticism is racist, the race card is being played to shield them from criticism, that's in no way acceptable any more than if white politicians said blacks or hispanics cant criticise them! The term people of colour is a fine example of how anti white rhetoric dreamt up by the identitarians has been accepted by the left as perfectly ok, it excludes one race only, it says it's us(everyone who is not white) and them (the whites) clearly whites are seen by non whites as lesser people as well! If you want to call out racism, great, but it exists on both sides only it's accepted against whites! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2019 12:20:00 GMT
Or why the right are so frightened of them..
|
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Sept 3, 2019 7:44:36 GMT
How did the world lose its marbles? A new dogma has turned beliefs that once seemed common sense into hate crimes. If you say the 'wrong thing', you'll be thrown to the wolves..."We face not just a future of ever-greater atomisation, rage and violence, but a future in which the possibility of a backlash against all rights advances – including the good ones – grows more likely." "A future in which racism is responded to with racism, denigration based on gender is responded to with denigration based on gender. At some stage of humiliation there is simply no reason for majority groups not to retaliate with the exact same weapons that have worked so well on themselves." www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7415169/Religion-political-ideals-replaced-dogma-turned-beliefs-hate-crimes.html “The answer that has presented itself in recent years has been to live in a permanent state of outrage. ” Basically this article. |
|
voice
New Member
Goals are a form of self inflicted slavery
Posts: 41,262
|
Post by voice on Sept 3, 2019 15:36:19 GMT
Well really every weak piss article Rick posts from these tawdry far right rags.
|
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Sept 3, 2019 23:29:15 GMT
And there is voice's and justvans brilliant counter-argument. Should have known it would be way over their heads. It’s a Douglas Murray “the world is ending!!!” Diatribe. My response was all that was necessary and it was accurate. |
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Sept 3, 2019 23:31:14 GMT
Well really every weak piss article Rick posts from these tawdry far right rags. Basically. |
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,078
|
Post by mids on Sept 17, 2019 5:38:17 GMT
Waaaaaaah!!! Good on Boots for sticking to their guns. They know best. "Boots has been accused of racism for putting security tags on hair products for black customers but leaving ones aimed at white people untagged." mol.im/a/7471317 |
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,078
|
Post by mids on Sept 17, 2019 5:47:36 GMT
Hobbit and Jake are raising their child to be "gender neutral". "Hobbit Humphrey, 38, and Jake England-Johns, 35, who live on a houseboat in Keynsham, near Bath, said they are currently dressing 17-month-old Anoush in both boys and girls clothes." mol.im/a/7471323 |
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Sept 17, 2019 5:57:44 GMT
Waaaaaaah!!! Good on Boots for sticking to their guns. They know best. "Boots has been accused of racism for putting security tags on hair products for black customers but leaving ones aimed at white people untagged." mol.im/a/7471317Well it is racism. You can argue that they have the right to be racist in how they manage their business - but it is racism. At the very least their marketing / PR / customer service department is pretty pisspoor. Anyway people can just go to other shops that happily sell these products without insulting the client base. |
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Sept 17, 2019 5:58:06 GMT
Hobbit and Jake are raising their child to be "gender neutral". "Hobbit Humphrey, 38, and Jake England-Johns, 35, who live on a houseboat in Keynsham, near Bath, said they are currently dressing 17-month-old Anoush in both boys and girls clothes." mol.im/a/7471323Not sure why this is an issue? It shows how desperately beholden we are to imposed gender norms that a 17 months old attire works people up. Who is harmed by this? Nobody. As such why would anybody care. |
|
