|
|
Post by Marshall on Jan 25, 2019 19:28:56 GMT
That was a good article. Imagine, a journalist actually watching video of the entire situation as it played out and then reporting on it.
Not sure why not bothering to read it because you want to keep your preconceptions intact is a good thing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jan 25, 2019 20:38:24 GMT
That was a good article. Imagine, a journalist actually watching video of the entire situation as it played out and then reporting on it. Not sure why not bothering to read it because you want to keep your preconceptions intact is a good thing. That’s not why I didn’t read it. |
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jan 25, 2019 20:39:37 GMT
No interest in it after I read that moronic statement. Staying with THE NARRATIVE. Nope. That’s not what I said. How could you quote what I said and then still fail to understand it? |
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jan 25, 2019 20:40:20 GMT
Do I take it MAGA hats are the US equivalent of flying the Union Jack Doubtful. |
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Jan 25, 2019 21:15:14 GMT
Do I take it MAGA hats are the US equivalent of flying the Union Jack Doubtful. More like le tricoleur. |
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jan 25, 2019 21:21:39 GMT
Still doubtful.
|
|
|
|
Post by Marshall on Jan 25, 2019 23:02:42 GMT
That was a good article. Imagine, a journalist actually watching video of the entire situation as it played out and then reporting on it. Not sure why not bothering to read it because you want to keep your preconceptions intact is a good thing. That’s not why I didn’t read it. Why didn't you then? It should be noted that the person who wrote that piece is explicitly anti-Trump yet still manages to give an honest assessment of the situation. |
|
|
|
Post by wetkingcanute on Jan 25, 2019 23:21:21 GMT
important point Marshall
|
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jan 26, 2019 6:35:37 GMT
That’s not why I didn’t read it. Why didn't you then? It should be noted that the person who wrote that piece is explicitly anti-Trump yet still manages to give an honest assessment of the situation. I have already said about 3 times. |
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,024
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Jan 26, 2019 6:44:01 GMT
It's The Narrative, isn't it?
|
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jan 26, 2019 7:00:31 GMT
Sexist.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,024
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Jan 26, 2019 7:54:46 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Marshall on Jan 26, 2019 8:48:13 GMT
Some moronic statement someone made decided the whole thing for her.
|
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jan 26, 2019 9:59:36 GMT
If by “the whole thing” you mean “I am not going to read anything that contains so moronic a statement” then yes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jan 26, 2019 9:59:49 GMT
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,024
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Jan 26, 2019 10:17:44 GMT
WRA.
|
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jan 27, 2019 4:18:11 GMT
If by “the whole thing” you mean “I am not going to read anything that contains so moronic a statement” then yes. The Narrative rules. Sexist. |
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,024
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Feb 20, 2019 18:53:17 GMT
|
|
voice
New Member
Goals are a form of self inflicted slavery
Posts: 41,233
|
Post by voice on Feb 20, 2019 19:09:01 GMT
Shouldn't this be on the extreme snowflake thread (oh they said my smirk means I'm a bad person waaaaaaah), this frivolous lawsuit won't get anywhere mind, though you have to wonder who's funding it, you need deep deep pockets to launch an attack like this and see it through.
Also why the WP, it was carried by everyone in the media and beyond, its almost as if the far rights obsession with the WP and Bezos in particular might be driving this.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,024
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Feb 20, 2019 19:22:36 GMT
I think it's a bit more than snowflakey when people are calling for the deaths of children. Also, my sources tell me that this is just the first of many law suits. I hope he wins astronomical.
|
|
