|
Post by omnipleasant on Jan 27, 2009 16:16:15 GMT
You're absolutely right, Jonren. He could indeed have done something.
It would have involved, essentially, protectionism, a rejection of many Thatcherite free-market principles like free trade, more red tape and regulation and a bigger state, much tighter state control over the activities and wealth of the super-rich, etc etc.
Measures you would have agreed with, yes?
|
|
|
Post by omnipleasant on Jan 27, 2009 16:17:22 GMT
"We have a debt now that your granchildren will be paying off."
What do you mean?
|
|
|
Post by minge tightly on Jan 27, 2009 16:18:11 GMT
"a rejection of many Thatcherite free-market principles "
Seems like a lot of companies are rapidly rejecting such principles and angling for a state bail-out
|
|
|
Post by jonren on Jan 27, 2009 16:19:34 GMT
If it was explained that it was absolutely necessary to avert disaster, we would all have bought it. To say he saw this coming in his first year as chancellor is a lie.
|
|
|
Post by omnipleasant on Jan 27, 2009 16:19:53 GMT
"Seems like a lot of companies are rapidly rejecting such principles and angling for a state bail-out"
Yeah. Socialism for the rich.
Fcuking cnuts.
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Jan 27, 2009 16:20:23 GMT
I really don't understand why the government wants to save the car industry.
|
|
|
Post by omnipleasant on Jan 27, 2009 16:20:32 GMT
To say that Brown has claimed he "saw it all coming" is an outright lie, Jonren.
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Jan 27, 2009 16:21:49 GMT
I don't see why regulating the banking sector, which apparently Gordon wanted to do but couldn't really be bothered with to save the world, would necessarily be protectionist.
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Jan 27, 2009 16:22:31 GMT
He did say that he foresaw the problems 10 years ago and proposed a magic early warning system, but didn't actually do anything about it.
|
|
|
Post by omnipleasant on Jan 27, 2009 16:23:09 GMT
Andy - I suspect it's a number of reasons. 1) it's essentially a reasonably healthy industry. 2) it's a big chunk of the economy which CAN be saved with one package, unlike most sectors. 3) lots of jobs in key seats for Labour.
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Jan 27, 2009 16:25:35 GMT
Is it healthy? We make cars which kill the planet, and make profits for Japanese and French and German companies. Why save them?
|
|
|
Post by minge tightly on Jan 27, 2009 16:27:55 GMT
There is a very good argument for saving those sectors of industry that are highly skilled and where the loss of skilled employees would be diffiult to replace once the upturn comes (Eventually).
Don't think the car industry here warrants that mind.
There is the temptation to attach conditions on a car bail-out though, such as environmentally sound motors ruuning on electricity. That would however, require a system of electrical forecourts across the nation.
|
|
|
Post by jonren on Jan 27, 2009 16:32:50 GMT
Thanks, Andy. Pehaps Omni will withdraw his accusation of me lying. In nearly seven years on this forum, that is one thing I have not done.
|
|
|
Post by jonren on Jan 27, 2009 16:36:15 GMT
|
|
|
Post by newyorker on Jan 27, 2009 16:39:47 GMT
How conservative is Ronald Reagan on the scale of British politics?
Find the guy that matches and vote for him!
|
|
|
Post by omnipleasant on Jan 27, 2009 16:44:25 GMT
David Cameron is just about as rightwing as Reagan, New Yorker, you'd like him.
|
|
|
Post by jonren on Jan 27, 2009 16:48:16 GMT
Norman Tebbit would do for me. Unfortunately, he is too old.
|
|
|
Post by jonren on Jan 27, 2009 17:00:23 GMT
" Car firms get £2.3bn loan package"
It is a loan. What happens if the car makers default? They will default unless the public start buying cars again and with most people at their credit limit, they won't buy. Remember, as I pointed out two years ago, personal debt would be the forerunner of the trouble we are in. Remember my "economy floating on a sea of debt" rant? We now see the results of uncontrolled debt and foolish lending. I await some senior bankers getting sacked. Fat chance. The pigs are getting millions in bonuses.
|
|
|
Post by omnipleasant on Jan 27, 2009 17:04:26 GMT
It's loan guarantees, Jonren. They will only get the cash if companies go under. It's designed to get them moving more than stop them going under. The main problem isn't with "people at their credit limit" either, it's with credit impossible to come by even for solvent people / businesses.
That said, I'm mixed on the whole thing. It has it's merits, and is a low risk strategy for potentially high reward (lots of jobs saved, boost to the economy etc). But I'm not entirely sure it's necessary.
|
|
|
Post by jonren on Jan 27, 2009 17:17:51 GMT
Its the ordinary man and woman that buy cars, Omni. Without sales, there is no car industry. In the news at one there was a car plant lot, I'm not sure which, with hundreds lying awaiting requests from dealers that are not coming.
|
|