yord
New Member
Posts: 14,352 
|
Post by yord on Feb 4, 2009 0:44:49 GMT
intent is whatever that allows you access to knowledge, you can call it whatever you like such as a force . It isnt important as it has to be indifferent . What is important is that it is usable
|
|
yord
New Member
Posts: 14,352
|
Post by yord on Feb 4, 2009 0:48:49 GMT
no willpower is yours , intent certainly isnt
|
|
yord
New Member
Posts: 14,352
|
Post by yord on Feb 4, 2009 0:50:37 GMT
and knowledge is explaining the unexplainable
|
|
yord
New Member
Posts: 14,352
|
Post by yord on Feb 4, 2009 0:51:41 GMT
you can never explain that but not explaining it dosnt prevent you from knowing it
|
|
yord
New Member
Posts: 14,352
|
Post by yord on Feb 4, 2009 0:53:24 GMT
and the undienable proof is , if it works for you
|
|
yord
New Member
Posts: 14,352
|
Post by yord on Feb 4, 2009 0:59:32 GMT
a delibrate intending to use intent
|
|
yord
New Member
Posts: 14,352
|
Post by yord on Feb 4, 2009 1:02:32 GMT
how else could you explain something you know without knowing it
|
|
|
|
Post by Marshall on Feb 4, 2009 1:05:49 GMT
You've lost me, yord. Surely you aren't talking about intuition?
|
|
yord
New Member
Posts: 14,352
|
Post by yord on Feb 4, 2009 1:06:49 GMT
you dont think you know things that you dont know marshal ?
|
|
yord
New Member
Posts: 14,352
|
Post by yord on Feb 4, 2009 1:09:24 GMT
yet you know what you perceive isnt neccessarily true
|
|
yord
New Member
Posts: 14,352
|
Post by yord on Feb 4, 2009 1:12:01 GMT
in fact what you perceive is in all probability as far from being true as possible . The only use for perception is to allow you to operate in the enviroment that your in
|
|
|
|
Post by Marshall on Feb 4, 2009 1:12:37 GMT
I know what I perceive is very different from the actual reality I am perceiving, yes.
Knowing things you don't know - are you talking about assumptions or faith?
|
|
yord
New Member
Posts: 14,352
|
Post by yord on Feb 4, 2009 1:22:14 GMT
No Im talking about the things that you know with an absolute certainty , yet you have no way of explaining how you have aquired that knowledge. Assuming can be dissmissed instantly . Faith can not be dismissed but is entirely explainable as it can not be commanded
|
|
|
|
Post by Marshall on Feb 4, 2009 1:24:06 GMT
How is that different from intuition?
|
|
yord
New Member
Posts: 14,352
|
Post by yord on Feb 4, 2009 1:30:32 GMT
intuition is the same as perception in that it can be false as assuming something is not knowing , only guesswork.
|
|
yord
New Member
Posts: 14,352
|
Post by yord on Feb 4, 2009 1:31:22 GMT
the only proof you can have is if it works . It works fine for me
|
|
yord
New Member
Posts: 14,352
|
Post by yord on Feb 4, 2009 1:34:45 GMT
or youi can feck on with a god and evolution if you want , neither of which will ever work or stand up to scrutiny, although shifting mountains with faith is a pretty neat fecking trick if you can pull it off , so far I aint met anyone that can
|
|
|
|
Post by Marshall on Feb 4, 2009 1:36:34 GMT
I think by definition, intuition means knowledge gained from inside. "Knowing" as opposed to "believing" is implicit.
|
|
yord
New Member
Posts: 14,352
|
Post by yord on Feb 4, 2009 1:43:46 GMT
in that case I would say yes , I always took intuition as a bit hit and miss
|
|
|
|
Post by Marshall on Feb 4, 2009 1:53:27 GMT
Ok, I get you. I would consider intuition that missed as a bad hunch.
|
|
