mids
New Member
Posts: 61,078
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Feb 12, 2009 9:16:09 GMT
I'm really hoping this article is just a piss-take. It must be mustn't it? Surely the point of going to prison is that you forego your freedom and all that goes along with it? Surely the right to family life must also include the responsibility that goes along with it? In fact, isn't responsibility the main point about having a family, not that you should have the right to it? www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/feb/11/prisonsandprobation-sexual-health
|
|
dwad
New Member
Posts: 1,146
|
Post by dwad on Feb 12, 2009 10:07:02 GMT
I'm pretty pant-wettingly liberal when it comes to the treatment of prisoners but this just takes the piss. There's even a blog on CiF about the nightmare of sexual frustration in prisons. There is a large part of me that thinks prison is the ideal place to learn a little self-control which if you'd had a little earlier would have prevented your being there in the first place.
And of course while battles over IVF rage outside we are now considering whether absent mass-murdering fathers are suitable for treatment - er, no.
|
|
VikingHumpingWitch
New Member
"My philosophy in life is keep dry and keep away from children. I got it from a matchbox."
Posts: 8,018
|
Post by VikingHumpingWitch on Feb 12, 2009 10:11:44 GMT
More or less what dwad said.
I think there's a strong case for "the right to family life" being removed from the Human Rights Act. I don't think you have a right to children merely on the grounds that you are biologically capable of producing them.
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Feb 12, 2009 10:15:23 GMT
Yeah. What those two said.
I'm all in favour of of the guests at our prisons having comfy double beds and decent power showers in their en-suite bathrooms, and a good quality meal 3 times a day, and so on.
But I'm really not sure that rumpy-pumpy, even via the medium of the syringe, is entirely approriate.
|
|
|
Post by policecar on Feb 12, 2009 10:15:53 GMT
<shakes head>
|
|