|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jul 14, 2011 11:56:35 GMT
Eugh!
But it's the same though isn't it. If it's so outrageous to wake someone via penetration, surely it's just as bad to wake them up by giving them head. Same thing really. (Leaving aside the unprotected sex issue.)
|
|
|
|
Post by wetkingcanute on Jul 14, 2011 12:04:07 GMT
Eugh!
no she didn't say Eugh.
More like globble glubble flobble blubble yum.
|
|
mango
New Member
Posts: 6,594
|
Post by mango on Jul 14, 2011 12:06:22 GMT
why 'Eugh' ..??
|
|
mango
New Member
Posts: 6,594
|
Post by mango on Jul 14, 2011 12:08:07 GMT
if you sleep naked these things happen don't they..?  |
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jul 14, 2011 12:08:46 GMT
His last sentence, I had an image of some poor woman waking up WKC in 'that' manner and copping a mouthful of something she wasn't expecting.
(You did ask...)
|
|
mango
New Member
Posts: 6,594
|
Post by mango on Jul 14, 2011 12:12:23 GMT
the funnies thing was after my firstborn I had some weird obsession with post natal checking checking checking, & nightmares we'd both fallen asleep while I was feeding her.
I woke up one night nearly pulling my ex's dick off screaming "aaaaaaghhhh the baby is trapped under you" - ooopps, sorry about that
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2011 12:26:34 GMT
Trouble is, now I'm in my dotage when I wake up I'm dying for a piss.
Surely you mean "lying in a piss?"
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2011 12:29:04 GMT
I woke up one night nearly pulling my ex's dick off screaming "aaaaaaghhhh the baby is trapped under you" - ooopps, sorry about that
I've hhad a similar scenarion where the lady in question has woken up screaming that I am lying on what feels like a baby's arm clutching an orange.
|
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jul 14, 2011 12:31:17 GMT
Har, har, haaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.
|
|
mango
New Member
Posts: 6,594
|
Post by mango on Jul 14, 2011 12:32:42 GMT
an orange..?? wtf?
no not the arm, I was talking about the baby's leg ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2011 12:35:55 GMT
an orange..?? wtf?
It's a delightful old English expression which you might not have heard.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,074
|
Post by mids on Jul 14, 2011 13:17:38 GMT
"no gentleman would ever, ever, slam in the lamb without prior, conscious approval."
True. Us considerate chaps just throw one out up her back, leaving her to her untroubled slumbers.
|
|
voice
New Member
Goals are a form of self inflicted slavery
Posts: 41,259
|
Post by voice on Jul 14, 2011 15:17:07 GMT
well as a righty you could penetrate to your full extent and not cause as much as a sleepy grumble....
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,074
|
Post by mids on Jul 14, 2011 15:41:22 GMT
My sides, my sides...
|
|
Muz
New Member
Posts: 12,255
|
Post by Muz on Jul 14, 2011 15:49:11 GMT
The lefties don't touch the sides.
|
|
Muz
New Member
Posts: 12,255
|
Post by Muz on Jul 14, 2011 15:49:35 GMT
8,000 fcuking messages? I need a hobby.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2011 15:49:39 GMT
well as a righty you could penetrate to your full extent and not cause as much as a sleepy grumble.... As a leftie, the state of your arse makes it unlikely that anyone would touch the sides. |
|
Muz
New Member
Posts: 12,255
|
Post by Muz on Jul 14, 2011 15:50:05 GMT
Loº°˚˚°ºoL
|
|
grizzley
New Member
It'll work sooner or later
Posts: 3,739
|
Post by grizzley on Jul 14, 2011 21:04:34 GMT
"Sweden's rape laws have several catagories, this is in the minor catagory and involves sexual partners having the right to be checked for STDs after the event of unprotected sex." My head hurts. The sex partners still had the right to be checked for STDs didn't they? <Goes off to research> Now why would anyone want to be checked for STD's AFTER the event of unprotected sex. Kinda like checking the seat belts of a car involved in a head on collision AFTER the accident. |
|
lala
New Member
Arrgh!! Urrgh!! No!!
Posts: 27,277
|
Post by lala on Jul 14, 2011 21:25:19 GMT
Eugh! But it's the same though isn't it. If it's so outrageous to wake someone via penetration, surely it's just as bad to wake them up by giving them head. Same thing really. (Leaving aside the unprotected sex issue.) No point in leaving aside the unprotected sex issue because that is the issue. Odds are, she'd have agreed to have sex with him in the morning if she'd been awake; so he is probably safe on the grounds that she was asleep (though it's arguable either way). But it seems unlikely she'd have consented to unprotected sex if he'd been awake when he started, so he can't hide behind the 'reasonable to suppose' defense. Beyond the specifics of the Assange case, if it is unreasonable to assume that the sleeping victim consents either to a blowjob or penetration, then some sort of offense occurs. The way you constructed your sentence is very bizarre, by the way; as if the offense lies the act of waking the victim, not the act of havin' 'em while they slumber, with or without protection. |
|
