|
Post by flatandy on Oct 4, 2023 5:11:22 GMT
In the long term I support the move away from ICEs.
And in this instance, this is a non-complaint. The move away from ICEs, as even you know, is about carbon dioxide emissions. Not about the amount of dirt that comes off tires and brakes. And even if that were part of the problem, it appears that there's only a 20% difference between ICE and EV brake dust.
Somewhere deep under this murk of bullshit there's half of a good point - EVs are incredibly, ridiculously heavy. And that does create a lot of problems. But if was picking up worthwhile concerns that come from the weight of EVs, it would still be a long time before I was worried about the brake dust.
|
|
|
Toasty!
Oct 4, 2023 5:53:41 GMT
via mobile
Post by perrykneeham on Oct 4, 2023 5:53:41 GMT
He appears to be arguing that EVs produce mors tyre dust than brake dust, though I imagine both are true. Even then, so what? We're generally taking about steel and rubber here, aren't we? It's not like either component is made of DU and asbestos.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,012
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Oct 4, 2023 7:27:09 GMT
Aren't brake pads asbestos?
|
|
|
Toasty!
Oct 4, 2023 8:07:50 GMT
via mobile
Post by perrykneeham on Oct 4, 2023 8:07:50 GMT
Not any more. I'm pretty sure they're not, at least.
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Oct 4, 2023 13:02:52 GMT
He appears to be arguing that EVs produce mors tyre dust than brake dust, though I imagine both are true. Even then, so what? We're generally taking about steel and rubber here, aren't we? It's not like either component is made of DU and asbestos. I think he was saying that they produce both more tyre dust and more brake dust because they're heavier. It's not news - we now that EV tyres blow out a bit more often because both the extra wear from the extra weight and because they're made a bit lighter to try and eke out an extra mile or two of range that you can claim on adverts. It is, of course, "So what?". They think it's an awesome gotcha because it's an emission from EVs. Even if that emission is not carbon dioxide and is, overall, tiny, and is also an emission that comes from ICEs. It's a ridiculously pointless claim but they throw as much of this at the wall as they possibly can in the hope that someone, somewhere, will bite. They've already got right wing politicians somehow thinking that EVs are "woke" and that the transition to EVs will put everyone out of a job and destroy the economy and hand the global economy to China and so on. Which is weird, because even the car manufacturers* want to make the transition and are pissed off with both Rishi Sunak for changing the UK's final transition date and with US Republicans for trying to sabotage the change. * apart from Toyota, but they want to transition to hydrogen fuel cells.
|
|
rick49
New Member
Posts: 17,031
|
Post by rick49 on Oct 4, 2023 16:07:06 GMT
|
|
rick49
New Member
Posts: 17,031
|
Post by rick49 on Oct 4, 2023 16:13:33 GMT
|
|
voice
New Member
Goals are a form of self inflicted slavery
Posts: 41,231
|
Toasty!
Oct 4, 2023 18:33:06 GMT
via mobile
Post by voice on Oct 4, 2023 18:33:06 GMT
I suspect Toyota might be going down the right path in terms of long term replacement of ICE, but until more buy into it and the infrastructure is built, it's gonna be hard to buy a fuel cell car. Vancouver has a few places you can fill up at, but the closest to me is nearly 100km away.
I was looking at their fuel cell car recently, on paper its a better bet than an EV but I'll probably have to go with an EV just cos you can charge those things most places these days, but I do think it's impossible to replace ICE with just EVs simply cos the minerals used in vatteries are in shorter supply, and as batter technology is not much more advanced than ut was 40 years ago the weight and range will remain a limiting factor
|
|
|
Toasty!
Oct 4, 2023 18:37:12 GMT
via mobile
voice likes this
Post by perrykneeham on Oct 4, 2023 18:37:12 GMT
Battery technology is a quantum leap away from where it was years ago, as any user of tools will tell you. In part, that's more to do with microprocessors (I think) as the theoretical potential of, say, Lithium was well understood, but tricky to harness.
|
|
|
Toasty!
Oct 4, 2023 19:14:04 GMT
via mobile
Post by perrykneeham on Oct 4, 2023 19:14:04 GMT
I'm looking to buy a folding ebike at the moment. Some of the claims for range seem very optimistic. We'll see, but if they can haul my porky carcass for 12 miles each way, that will be very satisfactory.
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Oct 4, 2023 19:27:29 GMT
E-assist, right, not electric motorbike? E-assist bikes range seems to be very dependent on how willing you are to do a bit of work. And how hilly it is.
If I had to commute I'd be on an e-bike, I think. They're very good these days. The only downside is people on e-bikes looking smug when they pass people on real bikes cycling up hills, which is really not the right approach - ebikes and real bikes serve different purposes.
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Oct 4, 2023 19:31:57 GMT
Deep down, by the way, Rick's link gets to an interesting point: insurers don't have enough statistical data to know what to do with EVs, and repair costs for EVs can also be very high because nobody really knows what to trust and what not to with broken batteries so they have a little prang and the entire battery gets swapped up. So EV insurance prices are all over the place. I expect it to settle down fine in a while, but it's a bit chaotic at the moment.
And yes, there is a potential problem of a shortage of battery materials in the future. But no real sign of it yet. Lithium is not particularly scarce.
|
|
|
Toasty!
Oct 4, 2023 20:03:18 GMT
via mobile
Post by perrykneeham on Oct 4, 2023 20:03:18 GMT
E-assist, right, not electric motorbike? E-assist bikes range seems to be very dependent on how willing you are to do a bit of work. And how hilly it is. If I had to commute I'd be on an e-bike, I think. They're very good these days. The only downside is people on e-bikes looking smug when they pass people on real bikes cycling up hills, which is really not the right approach - ebikes and real bikes serve different purposes. Yeah, e-assist. The route is pretty flat and almost all on dedicated cycle paths. I want a folding job so that I can bring it indoors to charge and so it doesn't get nicked.
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Oct 4, 2023 20:11:53 GMT
I hope you're looking at something like the S-Works Turbo Creo. Almost nobody would even think you're on a road bike.
|
|
voice
New Member
Goals are a form of self inflicted slavery
Posts: 41,231
|
Post by voice on Oct 4, 2023 20:38:44 GMT
how the hell can they justify 12k for a bike?
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Oct 4, 2023 20:40:51 GMT
Because it's awesome?
What I don't really understand is how anyone can justify spending 12 grand on an e-bike. The whole point about an ebike is that it doesn't need all the things that you need on a proper road bike: for one, you aren't racing it, and for two, you have a motor to help you uphill so you don't need to scrape off fractions of a gram in thinner, lighter carbon and a thinner, lighter cassette.
|
|
voice
New Member
Goals are a form of self inflicted slavery
Posts: 41,231
|
Post by voice on Oct 4, 2023 23:29:14 GMT
|
|
rick49
New Member
Posts: 17,031
|
Post by rick49 on Oct 6, 2023 2:07:01 GMT
|
|
rick49
New Member
Posts: 17,031
|
Post by rick49 on Oct 6, 2023 14:08:58 GMT
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Oct 6, 2023 14:29:19 GMT
Good.
The whining in the article is astonishing and incoherent, particularly the fact that it's whining about us not helping our allies who helped Ukraine at the same time as whining about an exemption that helps Ukraine. But the whole thing is gibbering dribble.
|
|