|
Post by Yawper on Jan 16, 2009 18:48:24 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Foxy1 on Jan 16, 2009 19:19:45 GMT
is that the same guy who was refused a birthday cake for his son who was called Hitler?
|
|
Amazed
New Member
Posts: 1,843
|
Post by Amazed on Jan 16, 2009 19:27:13 GMT
It says so in the article...
|
|
grizzley
New Member
It'll work sooner or later
Posts: 3,739
|
Post by grizzley on Jan 16, 2009 19:31:43 GMT
I suspect there would have been no problem if they named their child 'Moshe". While I don't agree with their choice of names, its supposed to be a free country. Would the name Dweezel have been refused service? America. land of the free......bulldroppings.
|
|
|
Post by evenstar on Jan 16, 2009 20:21:08 GMT
They might have not removed the kid from the home just because of it's name, chances are the parents drew attention to themselves because of the name and then were found to have one or two other 'parenting issues', tw@ts, serves them right.
|
|
|
Post by tarrant on Jan 16, 2009 20:26:57 GMT
It's unlikely the children have been removed because of their names.
More likely something much more sinister.
|
|
voice
New Member
Goals are a form of self inflicted slavery
Posts: 41,233
|
Post by voice on Jan 16, 2009 21:49:32 GMT
Any cnut who cals his kid Hitler or Aryan nation is proberbly gonna be some knuckle dragging BNP type thug who's much more likely to beat his wife and kids.
Hope the kids can be saved
|
|