ootlg
New Member
Posts: 10,381
|
Post by ootlg on May 12, 2022 14:36:19 GMT
I wonder why they deleted the word 'chap'? Seems harmless enough to me.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,137
|
Post by mids on May 12, 2022 14:38:38 GMT
I assumed it was "coon".
|
|
ootlg
New Member
Posts: 10,381
|
Post by ootlg on May 12, 2022 14:40:14 GMT
Was he a coloured chap?
|
|
|
|
Post by happyhammerhead on May 12, 2022 15:00:13 GMT
clod?
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on May 12, 2022 15:17:30 GMT
Chav?
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on May 12, 2022 15:20:05 GMT
Is it also eaglist?
|
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on May 12, 2022 15:39:38 GMT
This is eaglist
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,137
|
Post by mids on May 20, 2022 8:40:55 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on May 20, 2022 9:18:31 GMT
"Dagmar Geisler". Nuff said.
I don't actually find this too much. It's not exactly graphic (no matter how hard I squint) and I suppose there's a place for it. I just question the overall need really. I guess it's a slightly underhand - if well intentioned - ruse to ensure that kids from super conservative backgrounds have access to this sort of information.
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on May 20, 2022 9:42:19 GMT
Also, if you tell kids this stuff before they go to school, what are they going to talk about behind the bikeshed?
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,137
|
Post by mids on May 20, 2022 10:00:31 GMT
I think there's a bit of adult projection going on by the author here. A four year old is almost certainly not going to be interested in sex at all and introducing ideas of oral sex and analingus is probably going to confuse them. It's probably ok starting to introduce 8 year olds to sex education but I'm not sure talk of kissing ringpieces is the right way to do it. Also, that creepily smiling teddy is meant to represent a child and the author is using it to introduce children to the idea that joining in with adults might be nice.
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on May 20, 2022 10:21:21 GMT
In many ways it reminds me of the Labour Party manifesto. Aimed at ignorant kids and largely about degenerate practices.
|
|
ootlg
New Member
Posts: 10,381
|
Post by ootlg on May 20, 2022 12:54:30 GMT
They have a manifesto?
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,137
|
Post by mids on May 20, 2022 12:58:15 GMT
They call it a personifesto these days.
|
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on May 22, 2022 1:35:06 GMT
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,137
|
Post by mids on May 22, 2022 8:29:46 GMT
That's because you're a degenerate.
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on May 22, 2022 8:43:46 GMT
There's probably a chapter dedicated to toilet paper mishaps.
|
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on May 22, 2022 8:55:01 GMT
That's because you're a degenerate. What’s wrong with it? |
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,137
|
Post by mids on May 22, 2022 9:08:18 GMT
It's telling 4 year olds about analingus and oral sex. I think 4 is too young for that sort of thing and, like I said before, seems to be more about projecting an adult view onto children almost certainly too young to understand and see it it in any sort of context.
|
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on May 22, 2022 11:50:29 GMT
It's telling 4 year olds about analingus and oral sex. I think 4 is too young for that sort of thing and, like I said before, seems to be more about projecting an adult view onto children almost certainly too young to understand and see it it in any sort of context. That’s not in the article - do you have the book? Also if this is just an available book how is it being “forced” on children? Parents can just elect not to buy it. |
|
