flatandy
New Member
Posts: 44,420
Member is Online
|
Post by flatandy on Aug 18, 2020 18:00:07 GMT
Yeah, it sounds like they're celebrating The Totally f**k*d Up and Pointless Partition And Death of Millions Thanks To Those Plonkers Mountbatten and Jinnah Day
So, you know, infecting loads of people with a deadly contagion kind of fits the program
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Aug 18, 2020 18:19:50 GMT
You think Partition was unnecessary?
|
|
flatandy
New Member
Posts: 44,420
Member is Online
|
Post by flatandy on Aug 18, 2020 18:32:01 GMT
Yup (Although I find it easier to argue that it was astonishingly badly handled)
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Aug 18, 2020 18:55:51 GMT
Why do you think it was unnecessary? It's not like "India" was an ancient nation state.
Badly handled? Maybe, but I would argue that the structures that held India together were, logically, in no shape to maintain order as it devolved. Big place, India.
|
|
flatandy
New Member
Posts: 44,420
Member is Online
|
Post by flatandy on Aug 18, 2020 20:16:10 GMT
There was no need to have a separate "muslim" nation when rump-India was already going to have a huge muslim minority. Perhaps there was a case for splitting the country completely, Punjab and Kerala and Sindh and Bengal being separate countries, but the partition as it happened seemed unnecessary.
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Aug 19, 2020 7:16:14 GMT
Except that India was an artificial construct and only held together for he convenience of the very state that the "Indians" wanted rid of. It was never India before becoming under UK control, so it is unreasonable to have expected it to remain so.
|
|
flatandy
New Member
Posts: 44,420
Member is Online
|
Post by flatandy on Aug 19, 2020 10:35:21 GMT
It was certainly never two states, one of which was designed to be monoreligious.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,018
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Aug 19, 2020 10:40:36 GMT
It's weird how a part of the Indian Subcontinent has now been magically transported to the north of England.
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Aug 19, 2020 16:01:54 GMT
It was certainly never two states, one of which was designed to be monoreligious. That's a rubbish argument. Pakistan isn't monoreligeous either.
|
|
flatandy
New Member
Posts: 44,420
Member is Online
|
Post by flatandy on Aug 19, 2020 18:37:59 GMT
It was designed to be.
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Aug 19, 2020 18:44:33 GMT
Pah! That's just silly. The whole post-colonial self-flagelation is so boring 90s.
|
|
voice
New Member
Goals are a form of self inflicted slavery
Posts: 41,232
|
Post by voice on Aug 25, 2020 2:21:35 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Aug 25, 2020 4:28:58 GMT
I mean it’s sad for him but Darwinism in action.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,018
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Aug 25, 2020 7:26:35 GMT
It's not Darwinism if it's his wife who dies.
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Aug 25, 2020 8:37:19 GMT
It's not Darwinism if it's his wife who dies. Eh? How does that not apply to her? Edit: Ignore me, I’m tired. It would not normally but the article suggests she was as stupid as him on the topic.
|
|
flatandy
New Member
Posts: 44,420
Member is Online
|
Post by flatandy on Aug 25, 2020 10:58:41 GMT
More accurately, it’s not Darwinism if they’re above child-bearing age.
It would be Darwinism if you kill the only person willing to shag you.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,018
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Aug 25, 2020 11:11:01 GMT
Spoondance. "Van Morrison has denounced the supposed “pseudoscience” around coronavirus and is attempting to rally musicians in a campaign to restore live music concerts with full capacity audiences. The 74-year-old Northern Irish singer launched a campaign to “save live music” on his website, saying socially distanced gigs were not economically viable. “I call on my fellow singers, musicians, writers, producers, promoters and others in the industry to fight with me on this. Come forward, stand up, fight the pseudo-science and speak up,” he said" www.theguardian.com/music/2020/aug/25/van-morrison-blasts-covid-gig-limits-pseudoscience
|
|
flatandy
New Member
Posts: 44,420
Member is Online
|
Post by flatandy on Aug 25, 2020 11:19:18 GMT
Never a man to shy away from being an idiotic arsehole.
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Aug 25, 2020 15:11:08 GMT
More accurately, it’s not Darwinism if they’re above child-bearing age. It would be Darwinism if you kill the only person willing to shag you. Pedants. It’s Darwinism in action and I don’t care about age etc. (Although technically not even. You don’t need to shag somebody to reproduce....)
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Aug 25, 2020 15:35:12 GMT
Just as well in their case. They have below childbearing looks.
|
|