|
|
Post by Repat Van on Feb 6, 2022 10:01:28 GMT
Also the hypocrisy of the Bear calling others “Puritans” (incorrectly) while labelling women “slappers” for having sex outside of marriage is…quite something…
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Feb 6, 2022 10:01:33 GMT
Maybe, I should have said priggish. And wrong.
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Feb 6, 2022 10:02:57 GMT
A woman can't find and develop a role in a marriage. Must've only ever had sex when married. Those seem to be your points. Yep, as I said - you have reached the (rather bizarre) conclusion that I care what Camilla is called. Or about her and Charles sex life (eugh!) You seem not to understand that I can refer to somebody else’s argument without it being mine. “Finding and developing a role in marriage oneself” =\= “being suitably molded into the role.” She got married to somebody she loved. That’s it. (Also note you made it gendered, not me.) Nothing that has happened should preclude her being called “Queen”. You seem to think she lacked agency. Why are you running her down? |
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Feb 6, 2022 10:03:18 GMT
This isn't a Catherine Cookson novel. I always forget you struggle with the English language as it is used. I have no idea as to the content of Cookson novels. They would like something I would hate but I guess you clearly love them. |
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Feb 6, 2022 10:04:12 GMT
Yep, as I said - you have reached the (rather bizarre) conclusion that I care what Camilla is called. Or about her and Charles sex life (eugh!) You seem not to understand that I can refer to somebody else’s argument without it being mine. “Finding and developing a role in marriage oneself” =\= “being suitably molded into the role.” She got married to somebody she loved. That’s it. (Also note you made it gendered, not me.) Nothing that has happened should preclude her being called “Queen”. You seem to think she lacked agency. Why do you running her down? I didn’t say she was “suitably molded”. Your agency argument is with Mids. |
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Feb 6, 2022 10:05:01 GMT
Maybe, I should have said priggish. And wrong. You could have said that but you would still be using that word incorrectly too. Or you’re just trolling because it’s not possible for to you be this obtuse. There is no definition of priggish that applies to “not caring what Camilla is called when Charles takes the throne.” Not one. |
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Feb 6, 2022 10:05:40 GMT
Nah, it would've been spot on.
|
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Feb 6, 2022 10:07:05 GMT
So trolling it is.
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Feb 6, 2022 10:21:58 GMT
Ah, the white flag's up.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,011
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Feb 6, 2022 10:46:47 GMT
Or the red flag...
|
|
voice
New Member
Goals are a form of self inflicted slavery
Posts: 41,231
|
Post by voice on Feb 6, 2022 11:42:34 GMT
You write this in jest but there have been some people on Twitbook saying this is a “slap in the face” for Diana. Hmm. Oh I anticipated that exact response. |
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,011
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Feb 6, 2022 12:14:38 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Feb 6, 2022 12:25:15 GMT
The monarchy is ridiculous, of course.
But if you’re going to have a monarchy where the spouse of the king is called queen then Camilla clearly should be called queen if Charles ever actually gets coronationized.
|
|
voice
New Member
Goals are a form of self inflicted slavery
Posts: 41,231
|
Post by voice on Feb 6, 2022 12:40:39 GMT
When Brenda pegs it they should just retire the whole stupid concept.
|
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Feb 6, 2022 12:50:28 GMT
They should retire it all now.
There is part of me wondering if Brenda’s feeling like she’s going to last another decade, so is happy to make this offering safe in the knowledge that Charles is never going to become king.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,011
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Feb 6, 2022 12:57:01 GMT
Nah, not while they live rent free in the heads of the left (as well as rent free in huge palaces). It's amusing to watch the helpless puce spluttering of the left.
|
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Feb 6, 2022 13:12:47 GMT
You write this in jest but there have been some people on Twitbook saying this is a “slap in the face” for Diana. Hmm. Oh I anticipated that exact response. It’s so weird how po-faced they are about it given the sheer amount of people who cheat and the number of people who are on their second marriage. And of course if they object to Queen Cam they should be objecting to King Charles…but of course they won’t. For obvious reasons. Monarchist Britons are weird. |
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Feb 6, 2022 13:14:40 GMT
I always knew she was evil. |
|
ootlg
New Member
Posts: 10,381
|
Post by ootlg on Feb 6, 2022 15:00:13 GMT
I think I may have royal blood. I remember my grandad saying he was going to crown me.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,011
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Feb 7, 2022 8:56:51 GMT
I see our glorious and future Queen, Camilla is to be given our massive diamond. Good.
|
|
