voice
New Member
Goals are a form of self inflicted slavery
Posts: 41,231
|
Post by voice on Feb 6, 2022 5:20:05 GMT
|
|
ootlg
New Member
Posts: 10,381
|
Post by ootlg on Feb 6, 2022 6:57:42 GMT
Fucking parasites, all of 'em.
|
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Feb 6, 2022 7:15:28 GMT
I can’t believe this is even a story or that anybody cares. Of course she would be queen - what else would she be?
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Feb 6, 2022 7:45:31 GMT
Worth every penny.
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Feb 6, 2022 9:40:08 GMT
Of course, a cynic might suggest that HMQ dollied this news headline up in the sure and certain knowledge that it would knock the BBC's antidemocratic Boris-bashing bolshevism off the front pages. Even Auntie knows that ER2 is the ace card and they need to show respect or face the ire of her loyal subjects.
Quite right too. We're not some vulgar republic.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,011
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Feb 6, 2022 9:42:39 GMT
Good. She got off to a shaky start but she's been suitably well molded into her role. Committed, selfless. As it should be.
|
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Feb 6, 2022 9:48:09 GMT
Good. She got off to a shaky start but she's been suitably well molded into her role. Committed, selfless. As it should be. “Role”? Being some dude’s wife is a “role” to be molded into now? Really the debate behind this is because she was a mistress but giving the royal family’s history I am not sure why that matters all that much. |
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Feb 6, 2022 9:49:39 GMT
Bit sexist and regressive, Van. And puritanical.
|
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Feb 6, 2022 9:50:50 GMT
You write this in jest but there have been some people on Twitbook saying this is a “slap in the face” for Diana. Hmm. |
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Feb 6, 2022 9:51:21 GMT
Bit sexist and regressive, Van. And puritanical. I think you are using words incorrectly again. |
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Feb 6, 2022 9:51:50 GMT
Nope.
|
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Feb 6, 2022 9:52:20 GMT
Nah you are. Definitely so.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,011
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Feb 6, 2022 9:52:49 GMT
"Mistress"
|
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Feb 6, 2022 9:54:12 GMT
Either you are using words incorrectly or you are mistakenly labouring under the belief that I have an issue with Camilla being referred to as “Queen”.
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Feb 6, 2022 9:55:33 GMT
Nah you are. Definitely so. A woman can't find and develop a role in a marriage. Must've only ever had sex when married. Those seem to be your points. |
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Feb 6, 2022 9:55:39 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Feb 6, 2022 9:56:52 GMT
Puritan too.
|
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Feb 6, 2022 9:57:11 GMT
Nah you are. Definitely so. A woman can't find and develop a role in a marriage. Must've only ever had sex when married. Those seem to be your points. Yep, as I said - you have reached the (rather bizarre) conclusion that I care what Camilla is called. Or about her and Charles sex life (eugh!) You seem not to understand that I can refer to somebody else’s argument without it being mine. “Finding and developing a role in marriage oneself” =\= “being suitably molded into the role.” She got married to somebody she loved. That’s it. (Also note you made it gendered, not me.) Nothing that has happened should preclude her being called “Queen”. |
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Feb 6, 2022 9:59:36 GMT
You’re definitely using that word incorrectly. |
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,011
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Feb 6, 2022 10:00:09 GMT
This isn't a Catherine Cookson novel. |
|
