moggyonspeed
New Member
"Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat."
Posts: 7,670
|
Post by moggyonspeed on Nov 13, 2024 17:06:33 GMT
It's always the same with the extreme left: "I disagree with you therefore I want you locked up." Their racist authoritarianism is never far from the surface. Remember a certain Mr. D. Trump back in 2016? "Lock her up, lock her up!" Ring any bells? So what you're saying is that Trump is on the extreme left? I see ... |
|
moggyonspeed
New Member
"Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat."
Posts: 7,670
|
Post by moggyonspeed on Nov 13, 2024 17:08:18 GMT
Why do the left hate women having a voice? I refer the honourable gentleman to the answer I gave earlier. |
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Nov 13, 2024 21:11:26 GMT
So you're saying Starmer < Trump?
|
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Nov 13, 2024 21:50:26 GMT
Imagine being all the way in the USA and really being obsessed with the random musings of a god awful, thick “journo”. Clyde don’t you have a new government job to attend to?! |
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Nov 14, 2024 16:32:35 GMT
|
|
voice
New Member
Goals are a form of self inflicted slavery
Posts: 41,225
Member is Online
|
Post by voice on Nov 14, 2024 16:45:36 GMT
The right "do something about the boats"
Arrests the biggest supplier of boats and equipment severely effecting the ability of the smuggling gangs to opperate.
The right "weak sauce"
You chumps just want to be outraged and unhappy, and nothing short of sinking every boat with the loss of all onboard will ever be enough for you.
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Nov 14, 2024 16:50:12 GMT
Haha! It's not illegal to buy boats. Someone else will have picked that trade to, no problem.
Sinking the boats with their occupants would be sufficient, if expensive, but it would be better to make it unattractive to come here in the first place.
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Nov 14, 2024 16:57:20 GMT
I wonder if it's time to make it near-impossible for businesses to use only cash. There's absolutely no need for it, and yet all you see is cash businesses on high streets. Strictly cash, and always curiously customer free.
I had my hair and beard cut yesterday by my pal Mo, who is Moroccan and clearly in a marriage of convenience with some disty-gussetted crone of the parish. He's a cash-only merchant. Absolutely no need to be. I got to thinking about how many of the hairdressers, antique dealers, chippies etc are just fronts for money laundering.
|
|
voice
New Member
Goals are a form of self inflicted slavery
Posts: 41,225
Member is Online
|
Post by voice on Nov 14, 2024 17:04:30 GMT
I've said many times, these illegals come cos there is work for them, this myth they come for benefits and free houses you lot have promulgated for decades just distracts from reality, companies, some very large, routinely employ illegal labour cos it's cheeper to do so, and cos so few Brits would do the job for so little reward. Targeting the employer's has always been the answer, make it untenable for them to employ illegals and the demand that draws so many will disappear
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Nov 14, 2024 17:11:20 GMT
Oh, they certainly come for the benefits too, eventually.
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Nov 14, 2024 17:12:24 GMT
We were certainly able to regularise the construction industry, that's true. Notnthe resi market, but proper construction.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 60,994
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Nov 14, 2024 17:25:11 GMT
|
|
flatandy
New Member
Posts: 44,409
Member is Online
|
Post by flatandy on Nov 14, 2024 17:53:15 GMT
it would be better to make it unattractive to come here in the first place. The Tories tried that for a decade and a half, even had a Brexit to make Britain even shitter, and yet despite making Britain as sh*t as they can it doesn't seem to have done what they wanted. |
|
flatandy
New Member
Posts: 44,409
Member is Online
|
Post by flatandy on Nov 14, 2024 17:55:42 GMT
Is "Subsidised housing" a euphemism for the concentration camps that asylum seekers are kept in while the government refuses to process their applications?
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 60,994
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Nov 14, 2024 18:02:58 GMT
I see freedom loving public opinion has forced the Starsi to reconsider their oppression of journalists. "The Home Office is reviewing how police record non-crime hate incidents to ensure that they are “proportionate” and protect free speech, Downing Street has said after the row over an investigation into a Telegraph journalist. Sir Keir Starmer’s official spokesman said it was important that police record non-crime hate incidents where “proportionate and necessary” to help prevent serious crimes that could result from them at a later date." www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/11/14/home-office-review-non-crime-hate-incidents-allison-pearson/ |
|
voice
New Member
Goals are a form of self inflicted slavery
Posts: 41,225
Member is Online
|
Post by voice on Nov 14, 2024 18:10:43 GMT
Good, incoming governments have a responsibility to review rules, laws and policies enacted by the previous administration, especially one as criminal, corrupt and with such authoritarian tendencies as the last Tory gov. I expect many more reviews to be undertaken.
|
|
flatandy
New Member
Posts: 44,409
Member is Online
|
Post by flatandy on Nov 14, 2024 18:11:25 GMT
Starsi is very good, btw. Have a chocolate button.
|
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Nov 14, 2024 18:16:17 GMT
I've said many times, these illegals come cos there is work for them, this myth they come for benefits and free houses you lot have promulgated for decades just distracts from reality, companies, some very large, routinely employ illegal labour cos it's cheeper to do so, and cos so few Brits would do the job for so little reward. Targeting the employer's has always been the answer, make it untenable for them to employ illegals and the demand that draws so many will disappear They are emotional thinkers. Things are true because they believe them to be true and that’s that. |
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Nov 14, 2024 19:27:11 GMT
it would be better to make it unattractive to come here in the first place. The Tories tried that for a decade and a half, even had a Brexit to make Britain even shitter, and yet despite making Britain as sh*t as they can it doesn't seem to have done what they wanted. Yeah, but by "less attractive" it is important to include the option of being f**k*d off back to whatever backwards shithole you came from immediately and at any point in the future that you transgress. |
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Nov 14, 2024 19:28:58 GMT
I've said many times, these illegals come cos there is work for them, this myth they come for benefits and free houses you lot have promulgated for decades just distracts from reality, companies, some very large, routinely employ illegal labour cos it's cheeper to do so, and cos so few Brits would do the job for so little reward. Targeting the employer's has always been the answer, make it untenable for them to employ illegals and the demand that draws so many will disappear They are emotional thinkers. Things are true because they believe them to be true and that’s that. At least we're thinkers. And doers. Would you like me to post some claim summaries from the DWP to illustrate my point? |
|
