|
Post by bertrus2 on Jan 21, 2009 15:57:31 GMT
If she evades arrest for war crimes, Israeli Foreign Minister, Tzipi Livni, former Israeli army officer and Mossad operative and daughter of a noted Polish-born terrorist, will be in Brussels this evening to ask the 27 EU foreign ministers to contribute to stopping arms smugglng into Gaza. Do you think this would be a good use of your money?
|
|
radge
New Member
Posts: 1,776
|
Post by radge on Jan 21, 2009 16:45:49 GMT
no we should give them all the weapons both sides need so tyhey can just wipe each other out, making the world a better place.
|
|
VikingHumpingWitch
New Member
"My philosophy in life is keep dry and keep away from children. I got it from a matchbox."
Posts: 8,018
|
Post by VikingHumpingWitch on Jan 21, 2009 16:57:45 GMT
Actually, yes. If they don't have any weapons in Gaza then Hamas won't be able to fire rockets into Israel in which case Israel will not invade Gaza, flatten most of it and kill lots of people. I think that would be a good thing.
|
|
|
Post by bertrus2 on Jan 21, 2009 19:03:41 GMT
It goes without saying that stopping smuggling would be a good thing. However, it would be naive to think that Israel wouldn't attack Gaza if there were no smuggling. For one thing there is the missing Israeli soldier, Gilad Shalit, on whose behalf quite a lot of destruction in Gaza was done before the recent Operation Warsaw Ghetto.
|
|
|
Post by reverend on Jan 21, 2009 22:24:21 GMT
yeah vox pretty much hit the nail on the head, and bert hit the gutter as usual!
|
|
|
Post by Marshall on Jan 21, 2009 22:42:10 GMT
It goes without saying that stopping smuggling would be a good thing. If it goes without saying, then why start a thread inviting opinions on it?
|
|
|
Post by bertrus2 on Jan 21, 2009 23:28:52 GMT
If it goes without saying, then why start a thread inviting opinions on it? For one thing, should we European taxpayers be paying for it?
|
|
|
Post by bertrus2 on Jan 21, 2009 23:31:21 GMT
bert hit the gutter as usual Are you replying to voices in your head? Certainly not, sanely, to anything I posted.
|
|
|
Post by puffin on Jan 21, 2009 23:42:57 GMT
Why is she asking the EU to pay for it?
|
|
|
Post by Marshall on Jan 21, 2009 23:53:08 GMT
For one thing, should we European taxpayers be paying for it? [/quote]
Oh, well I'm not qualified to answer that one then.
|
|
|
Post by bertrus2 on Jan 22, 2009 0:16:25 GMT
Why is she asking the EU to pay for it?T The EU is a major contributor of aid to the Occupied Palestinian Territories. The EU pays and Israel destroys. The immediate concern is for urgent humanitarian aid. Israel control access to Gaza. The only airport, built with EU funds, was destroyed by Israel several years ago. There is an Israeli naval blockade which prevents access by sea. By land there is a perimeter fence patrolled by the Israeli army. The EU, or anybody else, can only deliver aid with Israeli permission. A condition imposed by Israel is co-operation on stopping smuggling. It's not clear what would be required exactly but troops, monitoring equipment costs money and the EU is being asked to participate. "Livni said she had won an "understanding" during her two hours of talks with EU counterparts of the need to prevent smuggling of arms into Gaza from Egypt. However no details emerged during the news conference of how the EU and other international players could help counter such activities, given Egypt's reluctance to allow a foreign presence on its soil to carry out such tasks." tinyurl.com/cadw5g
|
|
|
Post by newyorker on Jan 22, 2009 0:26:23 GMT
"Tzipi wants your money"
Where do I send the check?
|
|
|
Post by reverend on Jan 22, 2009 0:30:54 GMT
its going to be a race now for influence between saudi cash and iranian cash, anything from the EU is really just window dressing!
|
|
|
Post by bertrus2 on Jan 22, 2009 0:47:21 GMT
anything from the EU is really just window dressing!
It's so nice you take this lighthearted view of the hundreds of millions of euros that the EU has given in aid to Palestine. It's especially generous of you to make your contribution to infrastructure, such as Gaza Airport, which Israel then destroys.
|
|
VikingHumpingWitch
New Member
"My philosophy in life is keep dry and keep away from children. I got it from a matchbox."
Posts: 8,018
|
Post by VikingHumpingWitch on Jan 22, 2009 9:20:00 GMT
Given the bazillions of threads on Israel in recent weeks, I'd say Europeans (not including me) consider the place of interest. If we're going to say it's nothing to do with us why should we pay then could we please, please STFU about it altogether?
|
|
radge
New Member
Posts: 1,776
|
Post by radge on Jan 22, 2009 10:22:51 GMT
let them both burn.
|
|
|
Post by reverend on Jan 22, 2009 12:01:19 GMT
anything from the EU is really just window dressing! It's so nice you take this lighthearted view of the hundreds of millions of euros that the EU has given in aid to Palestine. It's especially generous of you to make your contribution to infrastructure, such as Gaza Airport, which Israel then destroys. geta life bert . not to mention a pair of glasses!
|
|
|
Post by bertrus2 on Jan 22, 2009 15:17:48 GMT
[i ]geta life bert . not to mention a pair of glasses! [/i][/blockquote] I'd need mind-reading equipment to know what you're talking about. The EU has been a leading contributor to infrastructure and humanitarian support of the Occupied Palestinian Territories. If you're generous enough not to care that Israel is sending the financial cost upwards by destroying infrastucture and strangling the economy of the Territories, I can't imagine why you are so careless of your own money.
|
|
|
Post by bertrus2 on Jan 22, 2009 15:28:39 GMT
could we please, please STFU about it altogether? That's your decision. But the topic is interesting for a number of reasons. The mass murder of Operation Warsaw Ghetto did make quite an impact in the media. (so, News General) The inability of the UN to do anything about it, and throughout the history of the issue, shows that we're facing a failure on the scale of the collapse of the League of Nations, with the catastrophic consequences that that implies. Also, the failure to implement international law points in the direction of very horrible worldwide conflict, up to and including nuclear war. If we must have futile discussions, this is a good subject. Firstly, there is disagreement. Those working by double standards argue that what Israel does is good and the same thing done by the Palestinian resistance is bad. In the case of other terrible situations, the Congo, Darfur, there is no disagreement and, therefore, nothing to argue about, essentially.
|
|
|
Post by bertrus2 on Jan 22, 2009 15:36:13 GMT
let them both burn. radge
You are implying moral equvalence. There is no justification for that. Israel is a colonial power which is wiping Palestine off the map. Resistance to that isn't on the same moral level at all.
|
|