sweet soul
New Member
Keep The Faith !
Posts: 5,106 
|
Post by sweet soul on Jan 27, 2009 14:41:11 GMT
They will have built a nuke in a year. See skynews for more info
|
|
|
|
Post by jonren on Jan 27, 2009 14:54:10 GMT
They may make a mistake and fire it at Saudi.
|
|
Gort
New Member
Posts: 2,430
|
Post by Gort on Jan 27, 2009 18:53:42 GMT
Yes that is correct iran WILL have nukes within the year,,,,,,,Landing on them!!!
|
|
lala
New Member
Arrgh!! Urrgh!! No!!
Posts: 27,277
|
Post by lala on Jan 27, 2009 21:23:46 GMT
No wonder SS likes the Daily Mail so much. Can't tell the difference between a certainty ("will") and a probability. This is from the Telegraph. I've highlighted the important bits for the benefit of SS and others who aren't to good on nuance. I've Iran could have ability to build nuclear bomb by 2010, study warns
Iran will amass enough low-enriched uranium this year to have the ability to build a nuclear bomb by the end of 2010, a respected think tank has predicted.
By David Blair, Diplomatic Editor
Last Updated: 8:40PM GMT 27 Jan 2009
The International Institute for Strategic Studies has said Iran is months away from crossing a vital threshold which could put it on course to build a weapon.
Mark Fitzpatrick, the senior fellow for non-proliferation at the IISS, said: "This year, it's very likely that Iran will have produced enough low-enriched uranium which, if further enriched, could constitute enough fissile material for one nuclear weapon, ifthatis the route Iran so desires."
Further enrichment to produce weapons-grade uranium would take at least 12 months after the threshold that Iran is likely to reach at the end of this year. Iran's scientists will have to overcome numerous technical hurdles and fully master the enrichment of uranium before this can happen.
Iran is defying five United Nations Resolutions by enriching uranium inside an underground plant at Natanz. This process is highly sensitive because it amounts to "dual use" technology.
If uranium is enriched to four per cent purity – which Iran says is the only intention – it can be used to run nuclear power stations. If enriched above 87.5 per cent, however, the uranium reaches weapons-grade and becomes the essential material for a nuclear bomb.
Inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) are monitoring Iran's plants, which remain under United Nations safeguards. Their latest report said that Iran was running 3,820 centrifuges – the machines used to enrich uranium – inside Natanz. So far, 630kg of low-enriched uranium had been produced.
Large quantities of low-grade material must be amassed before Iran will have the option of converting this into the high purity uranium needed for weapons. Mr Fitzpatrick believes that Iran will reach this point by 2009.
If the country goes to the next stage and chooses to produce weapons-grade uranium, however, it would have to expel the IAEA inspectors who presently monitor its plants. The international community would therefore have some warning before Iran reached the point of being able to build a bomb.
(Full story: www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/4362989/Iran-could-have-a-nuclear-bomb-by-2010-study-warns.html) |
|
Gort
New Member
Posts: 2,430
|
Post by Gort on Jan 27, 2009 21:41:26 GMT
Still think Israel is just about to do the do on the Iranians so if anyone wants to get a chance to see the pyramids before the zone is no longer inhabital for the next 10.000 years get booked before august...............
|
|
|
|
Post by newyorker on Jan 27, 2009 21:44:59 GMT
Still think Israel is just about to do the do on the Iranians so if anyone wants to get a chance to see the pyramids before the zone is no longer inhabital for the next 10.000 years get booked before august............... I wish they'd just get on with it already. |
|
Gort
New Member
Posts: 2,430
|
Post by Gort on Jan 27, 2009 21:58:02 GMT
I THINK OBAMA WILL LURE THEM IN AND IF THEY DONT PLAY BALL HE WILL NUKE THEM AND SAY,,,,,WHHEHEY BET YAL DIDNT EXPECT THAT..MOFO......You can always dream......
|
|
Gort
New Member
Posts: 2,430
|
Post by Gort on Jan 27, 2009 22:21:57 GMT
But truly I think Iran will start the middle east nuclear war in which Iran will fire first and Israel will have to fire on everyone to make sure they cannot be over run by other muslim countries, and when the nuclear dust settles the world will be a better place with no middle east
|
|
sweet soul
New Member
Keep The Faith !
Posts: 5,106
|
Post by sweet soul on Jan 27, 2009 22:24:40 GMT
Lala, it wasnt the daily mail u nut, it was skynews. You should learn to read ok. Then check the first post .
LEARN TO READ LA LA!
' sighs '
|
|
Gort
New Member
Posts: 2,430
|
Post by Gort on Jan 28, 2009 0:50:15 GMT
AND?  ? |
|
|
|
Post by warofwords on Jan 28, 2009 1:58:45 GMT
They will have built a nuke in a year. See skynews for more info And ? It's ok for Israel to possess nukes and not become a member of the Non Nuclear Proliferation Treaty . I think recent aggression has shown the world should be more worried about some radical Jews pressing the ol button than those who are minding their own damn business .........Israel has never admitted they possess these weapons , I think it only fair that it come under the same scrutiny that Iraq did when Saddam made similar claims . I'll just remind you that only one country has ever used it's nuclear arsenal ..........Wanna guess who that was ? |
|
|
|
Post by newyorker on Jan 28, 2009 3:44:55 GMT
They will have built a nuke in a year. See skynews for more info And ? It's ok for Israel to possess nukes and not become a member of the Non Nuclear Proliferation Treaty . I think recent aggression has shown the world should be more worried about some radical Jews pressing the ol button than those who are minding their own damn business .........Israel has never admitted they possess these weapons , I think it only fair that it come under the same scrutiny that Iraq did when Saddam made similar claims . I'll just remind you that only one country has ever used it's nuclear arsenal ..........Wanna guess who that was ? Yes AMERICA, and we saved you from Tojo with it. Feel free to thank us whenever you'd like. |
|
voice
New Member
Goals are a form of self inflicted slavery
Posts: 41,262
|
Post by voice on Jan 28, 2009 3:53:42 GMT
Still think Israel is just about to do the do on the Iranians so if anyone wants to get a chance to see the pyramids before the zone is no longer inhabital for the next 10.000 years get booked before august...............
Its sad this level of stupidty is so prevelent here these days, fist you've got SS quoting some crap about Iran having a nuke in one year, (proberbly from the same sourse that told us Saddam couls launch all those WMD's he never had in 15 mins no doubt), then you get this gem, it beggers belife even a dumb asrsed biggot like gort would not know the Pyramids are west of Iran by a few thousand miles in a country that has nothing to do with Iran and has a fiersly secular form of governemnt who is harder on its Islamists than the US and Israel ever could get away with.
|
|
|
|
Post by warofwords on Jan 28, 2009 5:53:05 GMT
And ? It's ok for Israel to possess nukes and not become a member of the Non Nuclear Proliferation Treaty . I think recent aggression has shown the world should be more worried about some radical Jews pressing the ol button than those who are minding their own damn business .........Israel has never admitted they possess these weapons , I think it only fair that it come under the same scrutiny that Iraq did when Saddam made similar claims . I'll just remind you that only one country has ever used it's nuclear arsenal ..........Wanna guess who that was ? Yes AMERICA, and we saved you from Tojo with it. Feel free to thank us whenever you'd like. Forget it , Japan had no plans to invade Australia it merely wanted to stop the yanks using it as a military base. www.1942.com.au/invading-australia-myth.html I think you'll find that the US government desperately wanted to enter WW2 but public opinion was strongly against it. The attack on Pearl Harbour was the result of deliberate provocation resulting from shipping embargos against Japan (because of their invasion of China) that cut them off from their oil supplies............ It's the same strategy that was used in the sinking of the Lusitania in WW1 and the Gulf of Tonkin incident in Vietnam plus several other staged incidents throughout history. Because Japan was allied with Germany, being at war with Japan was the same as being at war with Germany ..........just as Australia was at automatically war with Germany because Britain was. |
|
|
|
Post by Charles Martel on Jan 28, 2009 7:35:26 GMT
ROFLMAO!!
I have heard loony conspiracists claim gibberish ranging from Roosevelt deliberately letting the Pearl Harbor attack go ahead because he wanted to go to war in Europe (which is why he...err...want to be attacked by Japan), to Churchill knowing about Pearl Harbor but withheld the evidence to Roosevelt because he wanted America to go to war (same logical fallacy at play again). This has to be the first time I've heard US-haters peddle the myth that Japan was deliberately provoked. I guess I will file that one in the same shelve as the notion that the Jews provoked the Holocaust.
What an utter lunatic!
|
|
|
|
Post by jonren on Jan 28, 2009 7:58:26 GMT
Japan had the avowed intention of creating a far eastern empire. It made no bones about that. Their reason almost echoed Germany's 'living space' argument. It had to have access to raw materials. Even without the atrocity of Pearl Harbour, Japan was over running British possessions. We would have been obliged to fight them and without the US we would not have prevailed.
The loss of a few hundred thousand people of Hiroshima and Nagusaki has been calculated to have saved approximately thirty million, had Japan fought on. That figure would have been made up of Japanese and US military and Japanese civilians. The Japanese, defending their homeland, would literally fought to the last man, had Hirohito decreed that. The loss of civilians to the A-bombs, is to be regretted but was unfortunately necessary.
|
|
Gort
New Member
Posts: 2,430
|
Post by Gort on Jan 28, 2009 8:21:15 GMT
I have no fear of Israel having nukes, but I do fear camel shagging rag heads with white mans magic as if they do not respect the value of their own live then they will have no value on kaffirs like us....Voice .. even a tosser like you should know if Israel was to nuke every muslim county bordering them Egyipt (thats where the pyramids are) would be one of them? You must be getting mixed up with the myan ones in south America.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonren on Jan 28, 2009 8:25:24 GMT
"The loss of a few hundred thousand people of Hiroshima and Nagusaki has been calculated to have saved approximately thirty million"
Sorry! Thirty million is erroneous. It should read - ten million.
|
|
sweet soul
New Member
Keep The Faith !
Posts: 5,106
|
Post by sweet soul on Jan 28, 2009 11:57:40 GMT
For lala.
'Uranium For Iran Nuke In 2009'
6:01pm UK, Tuesday January 27, 2009
Geoff Meade, defence correspondent
Iran will have enough enriched uranium to make a single nuclear weapon later this year, the prestigious International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) predicts.
The think tank's Mark Fitzpatrick made the announcement at today's launch of its annual global review of military powers.
During 2009, Iran will probably reach the point at which it has produced the amount of low-enriched uranium needed to make a nuclear bomb.
Mark Fitzpatrick, International Institute for Strategic Studies
"But being able to enrich uranium is not the same as having a nuclear weapon."
However, the survey reports doubts over US Intelligence estimates that Iran halted its work on nuclear weapons six years ago.
This points to Tehran's continued development of long-range ballistic missiles able to reach targets in Israel and beyond.
The IISS recommends a mixture of carrot and stick as the best international response.
It concluded a dual policy of engagement and sanctions, testing possibilities for Iranian cooperation while adopting targeted containment strategies, is the best way to deal with Iran's nuclear programme.
Foreign affairs editor Tim Marshall said: "Several think-tanks have come to the same conclusion.
"The intelligence agencies are more reluctant to put a time frame on it, and the report itself says having enough enriched Uranium to build the warhead is not the same as building the warhead itself."
wasnt the daily mail .
|
|
|
|
Post by warofwords on Jan 28, 2009 12:02:23 GMT
For lala. 'Uranium For Iran Nuke In 2009' 6:01pm UK, Tuesday January 27, 2009 Geoff Meade, defence correspondent Iran will have enough enriched uranium to make a single nuclear weapon later this year, the prestigious International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) predicts. The think tank's Mark Fitzpatrick made the announcement at today's launch of its annual global review of military powers. During 2009, Iran will probably reach the point at which it has produced the amount of low-enriched uranium needed to make a nuclear bomb. Mark Fitzpatrick, International Institute for Strategic Studies "But being able to enrich uranium is not the same as having a nuclear weapon." However, the survey reports doubts over US Intelligence estimates that Iran halted its work on nuclear weapons six years ago. This points to Tehran's continued development of long-range ballistic missiles able to reach targets in Israel and beyond. The IISS recommends a mixture of carrot and stick as the best international response. It concluded a dual policy of engagement and sanctions, testing possibilities for Iranian cooperation while adopting targeted containment strategies, is the best way to deal with Iran's nuclear programme. Foreign affairs editor Tim Marshall said: "Several think-tanks have come to the same conclusion. "The intelligence agencies are more reluctant to put a time frame on it, and the report itself says having enough enriched Uranium to build the warhead is not the same as building the warhead itself." wasnt the daily mail . They said the same thing back in 2006 edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/05/21/iran.nuclear/index.html |
|
