|
|
Post by jimboky on Jan 20, 2014 1:33:36 GMT
|
|
lala
New Member
Arrgh!! Urrgh!! No!!
Posts: 27,277
|
Post by lala on Jan 20, 2014 1:59:51 GMT
Apparently not: "Clarence House stated that when Charles becomes king, Camilla will adopt the unprecedented style of Princess Consort, similar to the style of Prince Albert. This is not the same usage as her father-in-law, the Duke of Edinburgh, who does not hold the title of Prince Consort." ( Here) e, I'm all for Phillip being granted immortality and being declared King of Britain. |
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jan 20, 2014 8:04:05 GMT
Hmm - they're still worried about the whole general public / Diana / divorce thing with Camilla then?
|
|
KrispyKoala
New Member
We've gone Global? Do I need shots for that?
Posts: 1,694 
|
Post by KrispyKoala on Jan 20, 2014 8:29:20 GMT
Interesting program on the History Channel recently, "The British"
It claims if the entire line to ascend to the British throne, were wiped out, the crown would be inherited by the Norwegian Royal family,
Is that true?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2014 8:31:49 GMT
Why not? WGAF?
|
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jan 20, 2014 8:36:25 GMT
Interesting program on the History Channel recently, "The British" It claims if the entire line to ascend to the British throne, were wiped out, the crown would be inherited by the Norwegian Royal family, Is that true? Probably. Dunno |
|
Woolf
New Member
Look for the rainbow, don't just stare at the rain.
Posts: 1,761
|
Post by Woolf on Jan 20, 2014 9:31:21 GMT
Interesting program on the History Channel recently, "The British" It claims if the entire line to ascend to the British throne, were wiped out, the crown would be inherited by the Norwegian Royal family, Is that true? Probably as they are all intermarried. The royal families of Europe are more inbred than an Alabama red necks. The problem with that idea is, that to remove everyone with a legitimate blood tie to the royal family would depopulate most of the UK. Its simple maths, every generation back doubles the number of anticedence. 2 parents, 4 grand parents, 8 great grand parents. At the 10th generation that is 1024 per person. |
|
|
|
Post by Minge är en jävla besserwisser on Jan 20, 2014 9:54:00 GMT
Interesting program on the History Channel recently, "The British" It claims if the entire line to ascend to the British throne, were wiped out, the crown would be inherited by the Norwegian Royal family, Is that true? Probably. Dunno Nope, Stephen Fry gets it. |
|
lala
New Member
Arrgh!! Urrgh!! No!!
Posts: 27,277
|
Post by lala on Jan 20, 2014 9:57:52 GMT
Of course, "Gets it" means something a bit different when Ming says it about a man.
|
|
Scooby Do
New Member
Where's my pic?
Posts: 21,324
|
Post by Scooby Do on Jan 20, 2014 11:42:45 GMT
Nope, Stephen Fry gets it. So we'd still have a Queen. |
|
Scooby Do
New Member
Where's my pic?
Posts: 21,324
|
Post by Scooby Do on Jan 20, 2014 11:44:57 GMT
When Chuck does get the crown, will he breed a new dog.
A King Charles Corgi crossed with Whippet. maybe.
|
|
auldhippy
New Member
"There are some ideas so absurd that only an intellectual could believe them." Orwell
Posts: 27,830
|
Post by auldhippy on Jan 20, 2014 13:22:22 GMT
Off with their heads.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2014 13:47:45 GMT
Nah, leave Queenie and Phil alone. And Anne.
Don't care much for the rest of 'em.
|
|
|
|
Post by jimboky on Jan 20, 2014 14:31:06 GMT
isn't it more likely off with your head? historically speaking |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2014 14:39:26 GMT
It wouldn't make a lot of difference.
|
|
|
|
Post by wetkingcanute on Jan 20, 2014 15:43:33 GMT
When he becomes King do any of you know whether he will take the title of Charles III or another name?
Also, will we refer to the last 60 or so years as the Elizabethan age? The neo Elizabethan age? or wot?
|
|
flatandy
New Member
Posts: 44,417
Member is Online
|
Post by flatandy on Jan 20, 2014 17:49:29 GMT
isn't it more likely off with your head? historically speaking I think a greater percentage of royals have been decapitated than of commoners. |
|
flatandy
New Member
Posts: 44,417
Member is Online
|
Post by flatandy on Jan 20, 2014 17:50:57 GMT
When he becomes King do any of you know whether he will take the title of Charles III or another name? Also, will we refer to the last 60 or so years as the Elizabethan age? The neo Elizabethan age? or wot? I'm assuming he'll be a Charles. There's been so suggestion he'll adopt anything else. The question I wonder is not "Elizabethan", which at least is understandable, but what happens for the Charles era? Charlian sounds more like a dodgy alien-worshipping sect. |
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,009
|
Post by mids on Jan 20, 2014 18:03:33 GMT
We'll be in the Carolingian era. Charlemagne, as he'll be known, will drive the M*zzies from our lands.
|
|
voice
New Member
Goals are a form of self inflicted slavery
Posts: 41,231
|
Post by voice on Jan 20, 2014 18:04:13 GMT
Sad thing for Charlie is he probably wont be on the throne long enough to lend his name to an age, if Brenda's mum is owt to go by she's not going anywhere soon and never looked likely to abdicate.
|
|
