|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Sept 19, 2019 11:23:26 GMT
I have it sent to me. No grabbing off shelves required. I did see your first response, which was "Yeah" there was no need to edit. There was, that's why I edited it. I misread your post. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 19, 2019 11:24:21 GMT
What will change?
|
|
|
|
Post by whitewine on Sept 19, 2019 11:26:33 GMT
His post above yours, he edited again...lol
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Sept 19, 2019 11:27:00 GMT
Ha .....
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 60,962
|
Post by mids on Sept 19, 2019 12:04:22 GMT
Brexit: it's great.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 19, 2019 12:14:39 GMT
Keeps us entertained I suppose.
Regarding The [earlier] Divisional Court’s decision;
[It] concluded that the exercise of the power of prorogation is “not a matter for the courts”, such that it was unnecessary to “explore the facts”.
Today it was presented that:
If that conclusion were correct, the consequence would be that there is nothing in law to prevent a Prime Minister from proroguing Parliament in any circumstances or for any reason.
1. In the context of constitutional settlement in which Parliament is acknowledged to be sovereign, that would be a remarkable position for the courts to endorse. It would follow that the courts would not intervene even if, for example:
1a. Parliament wished to abolish the power of prorogation, and a Bill to that effect passed both Houses, but before it could receive Royal Assent the Prime Minister prorogued Parliament so as to prevent it from becoming law;
1.b a Prime Minister philosophically opposed to the idea of a standing army prorogued Parliament during the period leading up to the statutory expiry of the relevant Armed Forces Act, with the result that the Act expired and the armed forces were required to disband; or,
1.c a Prime Minister prorogued Parliament before the outcome of a confidence vote which his whips had calculated he would lose, for no reason other than to prevent it from being recorded that he had lost the confidence of the House such that he would need to resign.
Hilariously stupid, our old system.
|
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Sept 19, 2019 12:41:23 GMT
I don't grab anything off the shelves these days. I make my own wine and beer. For all the talk that Britain will be fine after No Deal, look who's making the most important emergency preparations of all... |
|
moggyonspeed
New Member
"Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat."
Posts: 7,663
|
Post by moggyonspeed on Sept 19, 2019 12:42:29 GMT
"Brexit uncertainty drives investment boost for other EU countries Cross-border data show 30% fall in capital entering UK since referendum" www.ft.com/content/93c681ca-7c9c-11e9-81d2-f785092ab560Ironically, research from the University of Sussex (amongst others); there's hope for the place yet. |
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Sept 19, 2019 12:45:14 GMT
Oh, well, that's OK then. Britain won't have any food, and 60 million will be unemployed and fighting over the last two cabbages and a cauliflower, but a few people will still be directing currency around the world from their eyries in Canary Wharf. "Creating value"... |
|
moggyonspeed
New Member
"Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat."
Posts: 7,663
|
Post by moggyonspeed on Sept 19, 2019 12:53:34 GMT
Totally.
The drop in inflation yesterday was due, in part, to a fall in the price of computer games. We can eat them.
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Sept 19, 2019 12:56:16 GMT
I don't grab anything off the shelves these days. I make my own wine and beer. For all the talk that Britain will be fine after No Deal, look who's making the most important emergency preparations of all... Haha. It's preparation for teacher poverty. Sacrifices must be made. |
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 60,962
|
Post by mids on Sept 19, 2019 13:02:12 GMT
|
|
moggyonspeed
New Member
"Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat."
Posts: 7,663
|
Post by moggyonspeed on Sept 19, 2019 13:10:44 GMT
Albeit last year - RAF uselesser?
And these are the Red Arrows mind - our elite, apparently.
2-1 to Belgium then.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 60,962
|
Post by mids on Sept 19, 2019 13:13:03 GMT
Different circs. Anyone one of our Few would have flown her way out of that situation with ease.
Anyway, M'Lud Keen smashing it at the Supreme Court.
|
|
moggyonspeed
New Member
"Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat."
Posts: 7,663
|
Post by moggyonspeed on Sept 19, 2019 13:23:11 GMT
What Few would that be then? Oh, you mean the War - again!
Glad we've cleared that up. Phew!
|
|
bertruss2
New Member
https://wallpapercave.com/w/wp3765741
Posts: 5,596
|
Post by bertruss2 on Sept 19, 2019 14:03:42 GMT
A Belgian F-16
That helps to explain why the Americans are so keen to hang onto control of NATO. A constant injection of European money into the American military industry. Our equipment must be compatible with American gear. Buying the F-16 from Lockheed Martin helps to keep America great.
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Sept 19, 2019 14:10:04 GMT
It does sound like Warmington-on-Sea Home Guard, doesn't it? |
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Sept 19, 2019 14:12:22 GMT
A Belgian F-16 That helps to explain why the Americans are so keen to hang onto control of NATO. A constant injection of European money into the American military industry. Our equipment must be compatible with American gear. Buying the F-16 from Lockheed Martin helps to keep America great. "Buying" is an interesting term. You don't think that compatibility of platforms is a useful thing in a military alliance? Maybe we should celebrate diversity and each nation use a different calibre for sidearms? |
|
bertruss2
New Member
https://wallpapercave.com/w/wp3765741
Posts: 5,596
|
Post by bertruss2 on Sept 19, 2019 14:13:34 GMT
Has our mighty aircraft-carrier been kitted out by the Yanks with its Lockheed Martin F-35 aircraft yet?
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Sept 19, 2019 14:14:31 GMT
Has our mighty aircraft-carrier been kitted out by the Yanks with its Lockheed Martin F-35 aircraft yet? What would you like them kitted out with? |
|
