|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jun 17, 2020 4:36:03 GMT
virtue signaling medical staff asked a toughie. interesting response. (video) "Approaching a group of medical staff at a hospital, a man asked if black lives matter. He received an enthusiastic “yes” from the crowd. He then continued, asking if the black lives taken by black lives matter. The “yes” was a bit tepid but he got one nonetheless." "But then the man broke out the real reason he began asking the questions and the response was predictable, but even its predictability didn’t stop the silence from being stunning." www.redstate.com/brandon_morse/2020/06/16/medical-staff-blm-abortion/“Look over there!” Seriously this is gold plated whataboutery. You cannot complain about police brutality unless you also berate black women who choose to have terminations? Is that seriously your viewpoint Rick? “ The black babies killed in the abortion clinics matter, right?” asked the man. The only response he got to his question was absolute and total silence. “Thought so,” the man said. He went on to essentially shame the medical staff for their stance of only caring for black lives if they’re killed on the street.” And to that question no, the lives of foetuses do not matter. Or rather they absolutely matter less than than the woman whose uteruses they occupy. And it’s misogyny writ large to reduce women to merely brood mares or insist that their rights over their own bodies do not matter. |
|
voice
New Member
Goals are a form of self inflicted slavery
Posts: 41,298
|
Post by voice on Jun 17, 2020 4:47:56 GMT
You gotta give it to the idiot he does know how to shoehorn his obsessions into just about anything. His hatred of woman having control over their own bodies being one his more popular ones.
|
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jun 17, 2020 4:57:13 GMT
It’s their language that is deliberately bizarre.
They make it sound as it a random truck load of black babies waddled into a clinic where they were slaughtered by the SS - Planned Parenthood.
It completely erases the humanity of the black women who are making the choice for emotional, physical, mental and financial reasons to terminate their pregnancy.
People like Rick would prefer to maintain them in a Handmaid’s Tale-esque state of forced pregnancy until they give birth and then are criticised everyday for being single mothers (those who would be.)
|
|
voice
New Member
Goals are a form of self inflicted slavery
Posts: 41,298
|
Post by voice on Jun 17, 2020 4:59:01 GMT
Though it odd the confess such concern when thay are fetuses but none once they are born.
|
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jun 17, 2020 5:14:11 GMT
Though it odd the confess such concern when thay are fetuses but none once they are born. Well they criticise the mothers when such foetuses are born for irresponsibly bringing children into the world they are completely unable to care for. |
|
voice
New Member
Goals are a form of self inflicted slavery
Posts: 41,298
|
Post by voice on Jun 17, 2020 5:50:02 GMT
While at the same time restricting access to contraception and termination.
|
|
voice
New Member
Goals are a form of self inflicted slavery
Posts: 41,298
|
Post by voice on Jun 17, 2020 6:01:00 GMT
This is more of the rights hatred of women exposed. Words can not describe the misogyny and downright appalling nature of this bill and these politicians. That's called sexual assault. "In what could only be described as the most astonishingly ignorant and stunningly misogynistic comments from a politician’s mouth yet — and there are certainly plenty to choose from — an elected politician said women who expose their breasts in public should have no problem with men gawking at or grabbing their breasts. Men and women in New Hampshire are legally allowed to bare their nipples in public, but State Representative Josh Moore and others are attempting to pass a bill that would make it illegal — for women only, of course. According to the bill, a woman could be charged with a misdemeanor if she “purposely exposes the areola or nipple of her breast or breasts in a public place and in the presence of another person with reckless disregard for whether a reasonable person would be offended or alarmed by such an act.” Though the bill ostensibly makes exceptions for breastfeeding, Moore does not. After State Representative Amanda Bouldin rightly criticized the absurdly backwards bill on Facebook, Moore — a politician people chose to author policy — responded with a post of his own, which Slate archived for posterity: “Who doesn’t support a mothers [sic] right to feed? Don’t give me the liberal talking points Amanda. If it’s a woman’s natural inclination to pull her nipple out in public and you support that, than [sic] you should have no problem with a mans [sic] inclantion [sic] to stare at it and grab it. After all… It’s ALL relative and natural, right?”" churchandstate.org.uk/2017/07/christian-republican-if-women-can-breastfeed-in-public-i-can-grab-their-breasts/ |
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,137
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Jun 17, 2020 9:44:18 GMT
Some very good thoughts about US policing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jun 17, 2020 10:33:44 GMT
This is more of the rights hatred of women exposed. Words can not describe the misogyny and downright appalling nature of this bill and these politicians. That's called sexual assault. "In what could only be described as the most astonishingly ignorant and stunningly misogynistic comments from a politician’s mouth yet — and there are certainly plenty to choose from — an elected politician said women who expose their breasts in public should have no problem with men gawking at or grabbing their breasts. Men and women in New Hampshire are legally allowed to bare their nipples in public, but State Representative Josh Moore and others are attempting to pass a bill that would make it illegal — for women only, of course. According to the bill, a woman could be charged with a misdemeanor if she “purposely exposes the areola or nipple of her breast or breasts in a public place and in the presence of another person with reckless disregard for whether a reasonable person would be offended or alarmed by such an act.” Though the bill ostensibly makes exceptions for breastfeeding, Moore does not. After State Representative Amanda Bouldin rightly criticized the absurdly backwards bill on Facebook, Moore — a politician people chose to author policy — responded with a post of his own, which Slate archived for posterity: “Who doesn’t support a mothers [sic] right to feed? Don’t give me the liberal talking points Amanda. If it’s a woman’s natural inclination to pull her nipple out in public and you support that, than [sic] you should have no problem with a mans [sic] inclantion [sic] to stare at it and grab it. After all… It’s ALL relative and natural, right?”" churchandstate.org.uk/2017/07/christian-republican-if-women-can-breastfeed-in-public-i-can-grab-their-breasts/I recall that. I don’t understand how he reached the conclusion that of women are given greater rights over their body, then men should be able to lay claim to women’s bodies. It’s weird. And even weirder that he seems to think men committing sexual assault is normal and natural. Says a lot about him. |
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,137
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Jun 17, 2020 10:52:35 GMT
|
|
rick49
New Member
Posts: 17,031
|
Post by rick49 on Jun 17, 2020 11:12:09 GMT
Although tbf Mona Lisa is a bit pathetic. One of the least interesting things in the Louvre. says who? |
|
rick49
New Member
Posts: 17,031
|
Post by rick49 on Jun 17, 2020 11:16:01 GMT
i do know how to get a guaranteed rise out of the nurse and justvan, don't i? triggered! they're so easy.
|
|
rick49
New Member
Posts: 17,031
|
Post by rick49 on Jun 17, 2020 11:29:09 GMT
|
|
rick49
New Member
Posts: 17,031
|
Post by rick49 on Jun 17, 2020 12:15:03 GMT
it's been over three weeks now. at what point did the mourning turn into partying, virtue signaling, and trying to get 15 seconds of youtube fame. i see a lot of people in these crowds just having a good old time taking selfies and mugging for cameras.
|
|
|
|
Post by jimboky on Jun 17, 2020 13:12:04 GMT
Though it odd the confess such concern when thay are fetuses but none once they are born. Well they criticise the mothers when such foetuses are born for irresponsibly bringing children into the world they are completely unable to care for. “We claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be. Such circumstances include cases where the newborn has the potential to have an (at least) acceptable life, but the well-being of the family is at risk,” the article reads. “We propose to call this practice ‘after-birth abortion,’ rather than ‘infanticide,’ to emphasise that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus (on which ‘abortions’ in the traditional sense are performed) rather than to that of a child.” www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/she-the-people/post/after-birth-abortion-can-they-be-serious/2012/03/03/gIQADgiOsR_blog.htmlIt is no longer just the unborn that are in danger,,, you know that there is a waiting line for babies to adopt, people are going to undeveloped countries to adopt, yet they are killing pre/after born here |
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Jun 17, 2020 13:26:12 GMT
Although tbf Mona Lisa is a bit pathetic. One of the least interesting things in the Louvre. says who? Says me. Small. Underwhelming. Da Vinci's other stuff is better. And the Louvre's packed with interesting stuff: The giant Delacroix pieces, the ancient stuff from Syria, Napoleon III's apartments. Mona Lisa is blah. |
|
|
|
Post by wetkingcanute on Jun 17, 2020 14:10:03 GMT
Have to agree with Andy here.
The Louvre has some superb stuff. And the Mona Lisa - if you can get anywhere near it - is a bit underwhelming.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,137
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Jun 17, 2020 15:53:25 GMT
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,137
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Jun 17, 2020 16:01:45 GMT
This is our Jo Cox.
|
|
rick49
New Member
Posts: 17,031
|
Post by rick49 on Jun 17, 2020 16:03:14 GMT
"And the Louvre's packed with interesting stuff: The giant Delacroix pieces, the ancient stuff from Syria, Napoleon III's apartments."
for how much longer with the cancel culture on the rampage.
|
|
