|
|
Post by flatandy on Sept 11, 2024 17:22:26 GMT
"If you can't command a mandate locally..."
Really, it's not like there were too many words for you to struggle through
|
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Sept 11, 2024 17:23:57 GMT
Of course, I'm fully in favour of STV, so every member of parliament would have a genuine mandate from their constituency, or maybe full PR so every government has a genuine mandate from the electorate.
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Sept 11, 2024 17:27:20 GMT
"If you can't command a mandate locally..." Really, it's not like there were too many words for you to struggle through What difference does it make? Popular mandate. End of. |
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Sept 11, 2024 18:11:12 GMT
It's not what he said. So it's not the same thing. So, you know, learn to read.
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Sept 11, 2024 18:37:25 GMT
What do you think he said?
|
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Sept 11, 2024 18:51:19 GMT
"mandate locally"
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Sept 11, 2024 19:32:08 GMT
Mandate.
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Sept 11, 2024 19:36:36 GMT
Sir Keith got less than 50% in his constituency in the 2024 General Election. Down nearly 20%.
Your move.
|
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Sept 11, 2024 19:40:42 GMT
Changed your argument to finally align with the point. Well done.
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Sept 11, 2024 19:48:06 GMT
Haven't changed a thing. All making sense now, is it?
Ejaculatio praecox, QED.
|
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Sept 11, 2024 19:50:15 GMT
Yeah, Labour must go. Less than 40% ofbthe popular vote . Cough |
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Sept 11, 2024 19:51:03 GMT
And?
|
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Sept 11, 2024 19:54:26 GMT
Changed your argument from that one to finally match the point made.
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Sept 11, 2024 19:55:50 GMT
So, according to Moggs (who hasn't contested the point) a Tory leadership candidate should not have progressed because he lacked a popular mandate from the 2024 GE. Neither Labour nor, as it turns out, their Fuhrer, achieved a popular mandate. By that logic, they should be given the same weight as said Tory.
Seems pretty consistent. I haven't changed my position at all. It seems that you've just gone off half-cocked and pushed on through.
|
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Sept 11, 2024 20:01:15 GMT
Oh, you've changed back to not being able to read, or at least understand the written word.
Make your mind up.
|
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Sept 11, 2024 20:01:49 GMT
Anyway, Moggs's point was wrong. But you were fighting a straw man in Moggs's wrong point and still seem to be.
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Sept 11, 2024 20:20:01 GMT
Oh, you've changed back to not being able to read, or at least understand the written word. Make your mind up. "I'm wrong" would do fine. |
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Sept 11, 2024 20:20:50 GMT
So, according to Moggs (who hasn't contested the point) a Tory leadership candidate should not have progressed because he lacked a popular mandate from the 2024 GE. Neither Labour nor, as it turns out, their Fuhrer, achieved a popular mandate. By that logic, they should be given the same weight as said Tory. Seems pretty consistent. I haven't changed my position at all. It seems that you've just gone off half-cocked and pushed on through. Totally consistent, and unchanged. It would be better if you just recognised your autism and booked an appointment with an NHS therapist while you're back in UK |
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Sept 11, 2024 20:21:12 GMT
It would. I'm waiting.
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Sept 11, 2024 20:31:02 GMT
|
|
