flatandy
New Member
Posts: 44,425
Member is Online
|
Post by flatandy on Feb 9, 2024 15:08:12 GMT
Biden didn't deliberately snaffle documents, hide them away, try and move them when found out, try and get them on his own private jet, wave documents giving nuclear secrets to uncleared randos to try and "impress" them. Also, Biden was entirely transparent and worked to help return any classified documents that were in his possession.
Not the same thing, as you already know and is massively clear.
|
|
|
Post by unclejunior on Feb 9, 2024 15:19:21 GMT
Biden didn't deliberately snaffle documents, hide them away, try and move them when found out, try and get them on his own private jet, wave documents giving nuclear secrets to uncleared randos to try and "impress" them. Also, Biden was entirely transparent and worked to help return any classified documents that were in his possession. Not the same thing, as you already know and is massively clear. “Entirely transparent etc”……haha & Ive a bridge across the Thames to sell you if you believe all that !
|
|
flatandy
New Member
Posts: 44,425
Member is Online
|
Post by flatandy on Feb 9, 2024 15:22:09 GMT
You know that there's no comparison. Biden's were there as cock-up (and, by all accounts, entirely standard cock-up that happens with literally every cabinet sec and Prez and VP), Trump's were there in massive numbers as a result of a deliberate act.
And, once again, Biden never showed the nuclear details to random passers by to make himself look all Billy Big Bollocks.
|
|
voice
New Member
Goals are a form of self inflicted slavery
Posts: 41,235
Member is Online
|
Post by voice on Feb 9, 2024 15:29:14 GMT
The memory comments strike me as a bit of partisan hatchet job by a republican prosecutor who knows he's found nothing, but still wants to do damage. Especially as Ivanka, Eric, Don Jnr Rudy, and Trump himself spent hours saying "I don't recall" during their various depositions and trial cross examinations.
|
|
flatandy
New Member
Posts: 44,425
Member is Online
|
Post by flatandy on Feb 9, 2024 15:30:36 GMT
Very, very true. It's definitely a deliberate hatchet job by someone who knows he has nothing.
|
|
flatandy
New Member
Posts: 44,425
Member is Online
|
Post by flatandy on Feb 9, 2024 15:31:18 GMT
It's also always worth remembering that Don Sr forgets all kinds of things all the time and gets all kinds of things confused.
|
|
voice
New Member
Goals are a form of self inflicted slavery
Posts: 41,235
Member is Online
|
Post by voice on Feb 9, 2024 15:35:12 GMT
Well both are really too old to be doing the job, and if they are both demented I think a demented Joe who lets people who don't want to destroy the country do all the real work is very much more preferable to a demented Trump who is surrounded by people who want to turn the US into having a Putin style GOP running the place forever.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,025
|
Post by mids on Feb 9, 2024 16:14:33 GMT
What's hilarious us that the left are really, really impressed with Biden's cognitive ability. They're in awe of it.
|
|
voice
New Member
Goals are a form of self inflicted slavery
Posts: 41,235
Member is Online
|
Post by voice on Feb 9, 2024 16:33:18 GMT
what's even more hilarious is the right think Trump really is a stable genius
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,025
|
Post by mids on Feb 9, 2024 16:51:03 GMT
The left hear Biden and they think, "Wow, he's so good at saying words. I wish I could say words good".
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Feb 22, 2024 7:57:06 GMT
Biden is a horrible man. A horrible, piss-poor excuse for a man. www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-68366306Can you imagine the lack of judgement, the ego and the contempt for others, that would permit a man like Biden to maintain a vicious dog in an environment where it was bound to injure people. Those people could - and should - have demanded the destruction of that dog at the first bite. It should certainly have been removed instantly. Biden's a psycho.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,025
|
Post by mids on Feb 22, 2024 9:02:04 GMT
Like owner like dog. Although does he even know he's got a dog?
|
|
flatandy
New Member
Posts: 44,425
Member is Online
|
Post by flatandy on Feb 22, 2024 14:52:06 GMT
I think that's basically true for all dogs and all dog owners. Dogs are dangerous things that it's impossible to know will be controlled, no matter how well trained.
As it happens, once you allow dogs to exist with humans, what Biden's done is pretty good - taking a fairly old rescue dog. The big problem is allowing that rescue dog to live in the Whitehouse where there are all kinds of stimuli that are not going to be good for an already nervous dog. It should live at Biden's regular ol' house in Delaware.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,025
|
Post by mids on Feb 22, 2024 15:53:21 GMT
They should both be euthanised and Trump and whatever dogs he has installed as emergency Pres.
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Feb 22, 2024 17:12:04 GMT
I think that's basically true for all dogs and all dog owners. Dogs are dangerous things that it's impossible to know will be controlled, no matter how well trained. As it happens, once you allow dogs to exist with humans, what Biden's done is pretty good - taking a fairly old rescue dog. The big problem is allowing that rescue dog to live in the Whitehouse where there are all kinds of stimuli that are not going to be good for an already nervous dog. It should live at Biden's regular ol' house in Delaware. That should have happened twenty-odd bites ago.
|
|
|
Post by unclejunior on Mar 5, 2024 8:42:08 GMT
US Supreme Court rules Colorado cannot ban Trump from presidential ballot www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68280062How unfortunate for the BBC that the Supreme Court ruled unanimously on this. All of a sudden their subtle hints of bias have been dropped. But the stand-out thing about this article is that it proves the actions of the Democrats to ban Trump from running were simple politicial persecution in an attempt to stop someone running for office. It’s the stuff of fascists and Nazis. THAT is the big story here. Do the BBC go anywhere near that ?. No. Of course they don’t. Instead they give all those who participated in it a soapbox to get one last attempt to slur him in: ‘Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (Crew), said in a statement that while the court “failed to meet the moment”, it is “still a win for democracy: Trump will go down in history as an insurrectionist”.’ ‘Failed to meet the moment’. Sounds a lot like how they spoke for George Floyd to me. This is what they wrote after the 2020 riot: ‘This is essentially an indictment for an attempt to overturn the republic and its most crucial process of preserving democratic governance’ I would argue this case is 10 times worse. It is the most deliberate and calculated act of attempted politicial assasination. This ruling should result in the removal of all those governors who supported it from office with immediate effect and THEY should be on trial. And of course don’t forget Biden told us all they would go after Trump with everything they could and they would prevent him running again. That is far worse than what Trump said to his followers in 2020. It’s very obvious the orders to go after Trump like this have come from the top. But not a word about any of it in the BBC report. Because they are as dirty, corrupt and culpuble as the Democrats. That all said ,can’t USA come up with a couple of better candidates ..?? Taylor Swift vs Chris Rock 🤔 ?
|
|
flatandy
New Member
Posts: 44,425
Member is Online
|
Post by flatandy on Mar 5, 2024 14:19:00 GMT
It's definitely not unanimous. The whole court ruled, not unreasonably, that states shouldn't be able to take Presidential candidates off the ballot - that would create a bizarre ad hoc system. But only 5 justices ruled that, somehow, it required some magic of congress - currently unknown and unwritten - the enforce the 14th amendment. That somehow Congress only has the power to do so rather than the courts - they basically completely gutted the treason and insurrection clauses of the 14th amendment making them totally unenforceable with a massive sweeping ruling. This is clearly wrong and clearly not unanimous.
|
|
flatandy
New Member
Posts: 44,425
Member is Online
|
Post by flatandy on Mar 5, 2024 14:22:11 GMT
As it happens, I agree that individual states shouldn't remove candidates from the ballot; and also that you should probably not be able to remove Trump from the ballot without some kind of judicial test. So he should probably remain on the ballot here and Colorado was over-reaching.
It wasn't an electoral gambit to defeat Trump, though. The only states that would have removed Trump were going to vote for Biden anyway.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,025
|
Post by mids on Mar 5, 2024 14:29:07 GMT
Does this mean Trump's now the President?
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Mar 5, 2024 14:32:44 GMT
As it happens, I agree that individual states shouldn't remove candidates from the ballot; and also that you should probably not be able to remove Trump from the ballot without some kind of judicial test. So he should probably remain on the ballot here and Colorado was over-reaching. It wasn't an electoral gambit to defeat Trump, though. The only states that would have removed Trump were going to vote for Biden anyway. This. I believe it is technically allowed but I don’t think they should just because of the image it gives. Even if it would make zero difference in the states that would have removed him.
|
|