|
Post by perrykneeham on Jan 3, 2024 17:58:51 GMT
To a considerable extent, the teaching profession has been complicit in creating the conditions that make teaching such a bloody awful job. It's an interesting mix of piety, naivity, incompetence and self interest. Keeping kids in education until 18 is mental. The legal requirement for mixed ability classes is mental. The standards of attainment are pitifully low (TBF they always were). The amount of teaching per day is shockingly low. The doctrine of self-led, research instead of "talk and chalk" is an offence to common sense, but oh-so trendy. When did they phase out teaching sets / streams in classes? I don’t have that big an issue with kids being required to stay in education till adult. Although it would be better if there were actual clear options for those wishing to leave school at 16. I had long forgotten it was ever 16. I couldn't tell you when streaming was phased out, only that it is strictly forbidden (but practiced covertly) in state schools in England. Towards the end of my foray into teaching, I became aware that there was a cohort of taller better looking kids being taught A-level Geography and I had never met any of them. I was allowed to practice on those who were there by happenstance (and whose chances I couldn't spoil by my inexperience, I guess).
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Jan 3, 2024 18:01:12 GMT
As I was walking into M&S this afternoon, a bloke sort of got in my way. He was walking towards me and reading a copy of The Sun. How very 1970s. I got to wondering who reads a hard copy of a newspaper these days? Also, what kind of Andy Capp still walks around reading The Sun in public? My mom buys a hard copy of a news paper every day. The Mirror. It used to be the (*vomits*) Daily Mail and The Mirror but she has finally seen the light. For the elderly, I can see that it5what they're comfortable with, and it gets them out of the house.
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jan 3, 2024 18:16:07 GMT
My mom buys a hard copy of a news paper every day. The Mirror. It used to be the (*vomits*) Daily Mail and The Mirror but she has finally seen the light. For the elderly, I can see that it5what they're comfortable with, and it gets them out of the house. Her job gets her out the house.
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Jan 3, 2024 18:47:55 GMT
Paperboy?
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Jan 3, 2024 19:00:10 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jan 3, 2024 19:15:53 GMT
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 60,992
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Jan 3, 2024 19:42:21 GMT
Those carpet tiles won't hoover themselves.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 60,992
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Jan 3, 2024 19:43:08 GMT
I bet the coastguard people were working their arses off. Quite possibly exhausted.
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Jan 3, 2024 19:45:51 GMT
|
|
flatandy
New Member
Posts: 44,409
Member is Online
|
Post by flatandy on Jan 3, 2024 19:57:40 GMT
When did they phase out teaching sets / streams in classes? I don’t have that big an issue with kids being required to stay in education till adult. Although it would be better if there were actual clear options for those wishing to leave school at 16. I had long forgotten it was ever 16. I couldn't tell you when streaming was phased out, only that it is strictly forbidden (but practiced covertly) in state schools in England. Towards the end of my foray into teaching, I became aware that there was a cohort of taller better looking kids being taught A-level Geography and I had never met any of them. I was allowed to practice on those who were there by happenstance (and whose chances I couldn't spoil by my inexperience, I guess). Is setting as well as streaming banned? I can see why streaming wouldn't be allowed. People (not mentioning any names) might be good at mathsy sciency stuff but absolute dogshit at artsy writingy stuff. Some people aren't good at everything but putting them into the thickoes stream would be very bad for them broadly. But setting - letting the kids who're sh*t hot at maths stay working on the sh*t-hot maths stuff, while staying with team Windowlicker in art - makes quite a lot more sense.
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Jan 3, 2024 20:03:50 GMT
I couldn't tell you when streaming was phased out, only that it is strictly forbidden (but practiced covertly) in state schools in England. Towards the end of my foray into teaching, I became aware that there was a cohort of taller better looking kids being taught A-level Geography and I had never met any of them. I was allowed to practice on those who were there by happenstance (and whose chances I couldn't spoil by my inexperience, I guess). Is setting as well as streaming banned? I can see why streaming wouldn't be allowed. People (not mentioning any names) might be good at mathsy sciency stuff but absolute dogshit at artsy writingy stuff. Some people aren't good at everything but putting them into the thickoes stream would be very bad for them broadly. But setting - letting the kids who're sh*t hot at maths stay working on the sh*t-hot maths stuff, while staying with team Windowlicker in art - makes quite a lot more sense. Both are, technically, unacceptable. Your "sets" are within the same cohort and the lesson plan must address each. It is often explained using a Nando's spiciness index, incredibly enough.
|
|
flatandy
New Member
Posts: 44,409
Member is Online
|
Post by flatandy on Jan 3, 2024 23:42:41 GMT
That sounds screwed up and unhelpful for anyone. Is there an explanation for it?
|
|
voice
New Member
Goals are a form of self inflicted slavery
Posts: 41,223
Member is Online
|
Post by voice on Jan 3, 2024 23:56:30 GMT
13 years of tory misrule I'd imagine.
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Jan 4, 2024 9:02:00 GMT
That sounds screwed up and unhelpful for anyone. Is there an explanation for it? Highly convenient pedagogical theory. There's this theory that children learn best by directed research, rather than "chalk and talk". Maybe, some of them, perhaps. In practice, it means that they teacher frameworks the learning and leaves them to it. It's utter f**k**g nonsense of course, but it suits the teachers and the government. I always ask what other countries do, especially the successful ones.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 60,992
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Jan 4, 2024 9:08:04 GMT
A friend of mine is a fairly big cheese in the world of education, particularly with excluded types. He's very firmly of the opinion that a substantial proportion of children shouldn't be at school past being able to read write and do sums (to a high standard). They're not suited to the classroom environment so it makes them miserable and this is a disruption in the classroom. Of course, there needs to be something along the lines of apprenticeships or the like for them (large numbers of them) for the idea to work.
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Jan 4, 2024 9:08:27 GMT
I should add that I was told, on more than one occasion, that the role of the teacher was not to presume to be the person imparting one's knowledge, but to be the facilitator of learning.
It was quite gobsmacking.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 60,992
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Jan 4, 2024 9:29:36 GMT
Is that because children are precious sponges, aching to soak up information and knowledge under the gentle guidance of the matriarchal hand of the NUT?
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Jan 4, 2024 10:14:51 GMT
Is that because children are precious sponges, aching to soak up information and knowledge under the gentle guidance of the matriarchal hand of the NUT? Well, quite the opposite. The kids are pretty much expected to educated themelselves while the Teacher researches their ethic, social and welfare background and tries to build a SEN case for why they're not learning anything. SEN conditions include such things as low prior attainment, disability, English isn't first language (even if they are completely fluent) looked after status, free school meals, parental unemployment, etc.
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jan 4, 2024 11:08:45 GMT
A friend of mine is a fairly big cheese in the world of education, particularly with excluded types. He's very firmly of the opinion that a substantial proportion of children shouldn't be at school past being able to read write and do sums (to a high standard). They're not suited to the classroom environment so it makes them miserable and this is a disruption in the classroom. Of course, there needs to be something along the lines of apprenticeships or the like for them (large numbers of them) for the idea to work. This could be an option as long as it is easy for them to transfer back to an academic environment later should they choose. Writing children off early because at 12 they could or keep still (I.e the German method) seems harsh.
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Jan 4, 2024 11:09:52 GMT
Is that because children are precious sponges, aching to soak up information and knowledge under the gentle guidance of the matriarchal hand of the NUT? Well, quite the opposite. The kids are pretty much expected to educated themelselves while the Teacher researches their ethic, social and welfare background and tries to build a SEN case for why they're not learning anything. SEN conditions include such things as low prior attainment, disability, English isn't first language (even if they are completely fluent) looked after status, free school meals, parental unemployment, etc. Is this school specific? My friend is a maths teacher at secondary level and this absolutely does not match what she describes when she talks about work.
|
|