Psalms
New Member
Posts: 2,026
|
Post by Psalms on Aug 24, 2020 11:52:01 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Aug 24, 2020 12:21:13 GMT
I don’t get the desperation US police have with “getting their man”.
He was walking into the car with his back to the officer. How is just letting him go (and taking his license details) considered the inferior option to putting 7 bullets in his back?
It’s confusing.
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Aug 24, 2020 12:42:13 GMT
Of course, he could have done as instructed by the police. He had just been involved in an altercation and could have had a weapon in the car. The car had blacked out windows, so the cops couldn't have seen what he was doing once in the car. It's unlikely they knew the kids were in the back.
So, unless the "victim" has deaf and blind, I would say that he's very much the author of his own misfortune. They usually are.
|
|
voice
New Member
Goals are a form of self inflicted slavery
Posts: 41,220
|
Post by voice on Aug 24, 2020 12:48:46 GMT
baloo making excuses for a black man being executed in the street, colour me shocked...
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Aug 24, 2020 12:50:50 GMT
He's not dead. Calm down dear. There'll be plenty of victim-frot to go round if he flatlines.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 60,988
|
Post by mids on Aug 24, 2020 12:52:58 GMT
blm will be gutted if he lives. They could always hope for paralysis and a wheelchair, I suppose.
|
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Aug 24, 2020 13:05:32 GMT
Police* really shouldn't be allowed to have guns, except in exceptional circumstances.
* neither should anyone else.
|
|
|
|
Post by jimboky on Aug 24, 2020 13:06:05 GMT
Police said they were called to the address to deal with a domestic disturbance, but it is unclear who called or what happened before the video recording began.
why not wait till the investigation is complete to criticize the cops involved?
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Aug 24, 2020 13:12:12 GMT
Police* really shouldn't be allowed to have guns, except in exceptional circumstances. * neither should anyone else. I agree, but that boat's sailed. |
|
|
|
Post by jimboky on Aug 24, 2020 13:21:06 GMT
guns worked out for the St Louis couple who managed to hold off the mob with unloaded and unworking guns, even though it was clear that they were not shooters by watching them the mob was still unwilling to charge the AR-PPK combo
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Aug 24, 2020 13:22:09 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by jimboky on Aug 24, 2020 13:25:47 GMT
Sad,,,, but when the MOB/RIOTERS tried to leave the city and move to small towns they were met not by cops but armed citizens, they chose to leave, Andy and the gungrabbers would have favored the mob/rioters
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Aug 24, 2020 16:50:02 GMT
As sure as night follows day ......
"The reporting however seemed to avoid Blake's apparent criminal record. Wisconsin Circuit Court lists a man with the same name, age and address as the subject of an active arrest warrant, with three charges relating to domestic abuse, including 3rd degree sexual assault.
©wcca.wicourts.gov
©wcca.wicourts.gov
A 2015 article in the local press describes an incident in a Kenosha bar, during which an intoxicated 24-year-old man by the name Jacob Blake drew a gun during a quarrel with another patron. When police later stopped Blake's car, he resisted arrest and was injured by a police dog."
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 60,988
|
Post by mids on Aug 24, 2020 16:52:11 GMT
And of course blm thought it was "fuckin' brilliant" when a 5 year old white boy was shot dead.
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Aug 24, 2020 19:06:35 GMT
I'm starting to wonder if at least part of the problem with trigger happy cops is to do with technology. It would be interesting to know whether Dibble was aware of who they were responding to.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 60,988
|
Post by mids on Aug 24, 2020 20:11:32 GMT
Surely all they need to know is, "is he black?"
|
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Aug 24, 2020 22:33:03 GMT
baloo making excuses for a black man being executed in the street, colour me shocked... It’s like being shocked to find it raining in England. I also read his kids were in the car? I hope that’s not true as cannot imagine how traumatising that would be. I struggle to think of any occasion where shooting somebody in the back, nevermind 7 times is ok. Thank god for camera phones. |
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Aug 24, 2020 22:34:26 GMT
Police said they were called to the address to deal with a domestic disturbance, but it is unclear who called or what happened before the video recording began.why not wait till the investigation is complete to criticize the cops involved? Shooting somebody in the back? See my earlier comment. |
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Aug 24, 2020 22:36:14 GMT
Of course, he could have done as instructed by the police. He had just been involved in an altercation and could have had a weapon in the car. The car had blacked out windows, so the cops couldn't have seen what he was doing once in the car. It's unlikely they knew the kids were in the back. So, unless the "victim" has deaf and blind, I would say that he's very much the author of his own misfortune. They usually are. He could have done as instructed. He did not. I still don’t see how shooting somebody in the back is considered a reasonable alternative to letting him go. Or even arresting him. The “oh but if he had only listened to me” so I had to kill him is a fairly weak argument. Especially when nothing about it appears to be self defence. |
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Aug 24, 2020 22:37:53 GMT
Police* really shouldn't be allowed to have guns, except in exceptional circumstances. * neither should anyone else. I generally can understand police wanting guns in the US because it’s a violent hellhole. I think the bigger issue is police being trigger happy and having this obsession with getting their guy by any means necessary even if it means shooting somebody walking away from you. In the back. 7 times! |
|
