|
|
Post by Repat Van on Mar 19, 2023 12:00:02 GMT
And out of your league. For both. |
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Mar 19, 2023 12:19:53 GMT
The lips of both are weird
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,032
|
Post by mids on Mar 19, 2023 12:23:21 GMT
And out of your league. For both. She's definitely in a different league from me. We agree on that. |
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Mar 19, 2023 13:55:49 GMT
The lips of both are weird Fillers. She clearly likes them. |
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Mar 19, 2023 14:10:29 GMT
And fellahs.
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Mar 19, 2023 14:11:17 GMT
Anyway, sod her. She's in prison, not Love Island.
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Mar 19, 2023 15:33:00 GMT
Funny how fashion works, innit? Theos3 eyebrows make her look like she has learning difficulties and I don't know any blokes that think it's a nice look on a woman. The brows thing seems to go hand-in-hand with fillers, fake tans and crappy manners.
|
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Mar 19, 2023 20:03:35 GMT
I really don’t know what fillers are, but they don’t look good on either woman.
|
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Mar 19, 2023 22:43:17 GMT
They fill parts of the body. To make things bigger or to even out lines.
For some reason the fake pouty look thing has become popular with women with thin lips naturally.
I get wanting bigger lips but there are so many good ways of doing it I don’t understand this look has become popular. But her lips. I prefer to mind the business that pays me.
|
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Mar 19, 2023 23:24:00 GMT
Is it an injecty thing? Or like some weird suction device that does it temporarily? Or some visual trick with make-up?
|
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Mar 20, 2023 0:00:24 GMT
Is it an injecty thing? Or like some weird suction device that does it temporarily? Or some visual trick with make-up? Injected. My old housemate gets them in her lips but hers look natural. I only notice because I saw her before she got them. I believe you have to get it topped up but if you go overboard it can look terrible - although obviously those getting them like the look. And their opinion is all that matters. |
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Mar 20, 2023 8:10:28 GMT
Bollocks is it.
|
|
|
|
Post by happyhammerhead on Mar 20, 2023 8:35:25 GMT
Yeah them too, if you're really insecure.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,032
|
Post by mids on Mar 20, 2023 8:50:17 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Mar 20, 2023 11:18:51 GMT
Is it’s reversible, or if it needs to be topped off because it fades over time, then that’s probably healthier. But Van is right. If people choose to do it, there’s nothing that should stop them. But I think it’s probably OK to comment on it. If someone chooses to change their voice in order to sound idiotic (say, Elizabeth Holmes or Margaret Thatcher) we’re fine to comment on that choice. If someone decides to say incredibly stupid stuff even though they know better (almost everyone in the current Tory Party except, maybe, Liz Truss who is actually stupid and Priti Patel who is actually evil, knows perfectly well that what they’ve been saying for the last decade is incoherent dribble), we’re fine to comment on that choice. So why not comment on people who choose to look really stupid as well as people who choose to appear really stupid in other ways?
|
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Mar 20, 2023 11:35:40 GMT
That's fair enough. If someone, being of sound mind, uses their own money to alter their appearance and they're happy to pay all the costs for the whole life of that procedure (including reversals and remediation) then they can feel free to do so.
We can still laugh at vain freaks though.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,032
|
Post by mids on Mar 20, 2023 11:39:40 GMT
|
|
ootlg
New Member
Posts: 10,381
|
Post by ootlg on Mar 20, 2023 12:51:42 GMT
That's fair enough. If someone, being of sound mind, uses their own money to alter their appearance and they're happy to pay all the costs for the whole life of that procedure (including reversals and remediation) then they can feel free to do so. We can still laugh at vain freaks though. Interesting, that, the laughing-at thing, because it's contextual. For example, I'd not laugh at a vain freak if he was built like a brick shithouse and standing next to me with his drunken mates in a pub. I'd pour scorn on him in a cavalier sort of way when he was out of earshot. |
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Mar 20, 2023 12:53:50 GMT
Oh yeah, you don't want to end up looking weirder than the freak. Or being laughed at.
|
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Mar 21, 2023 16:10:10 GMT
Is it’s reversible, or if it needs to be topped off because it fades over time, then that’s probably healthier. But Van is right. If people choose to do it, there’s nothing that should stop them. But I think it’s probably OK to comment on it. If someone chooses to change their voice in order to sound idiotic (say, Elizabeth Holmes or Margaret Thatcher) we’re fine to comment on that choice. If someone decides to say incredibly stupid stuff even though they know better (almost everyone in the current Tory Party except, maybe, Liz Truss who is actually stupid and Priti Patel who is actually evil, knows perfectly well that what they’ve been saying for the last decade is incoherent dribble), we’re fine to comment on that choice. So why not comment on people who choose to look really stupid as well as people who choose to appear really stupid in other ways? Reversible. Blac Chyna just had hers removed and looks much better (I hate that I know that but hey ho that’s what happens when you have nieces in their teens / twenties.) |
|
