mids
New Member
Posts: 60,988
|
Post by mids on Mar 18, 2024 10:53:11 GMT
Typical of the far left to elevate herself above the tragedy of others and get more money than the ethnos who were actually affected.
|
|
moggyonspeed
New Member
"Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat."
Posts: 7,670
|
Post by moggyonspeed on Mar 18, 2024 11:15:01 GMT
So what you're saying is that, given your bringing up the subject of "the ethnos" and the fact that she is white, that whites have a predisposition to rip off the system?
Imagine what you would have said had she herself been "an ethno".
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Mar 18, 2024 11:58:24 GMT
Typical of the far left to elevate herself above the tragedy of others and get more money than the ethnos who were actually affected. She didn’t set the compensation award. But she deserves compensation for being fired for being sick.
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Mar 18, 2024 12:07:27 GMT
Not good/bad for her. Just bad for the Labour council sacking someone for being sick. It seems entirely reasonable that you could suffer PTSD if you thought your job was a boring council job and then you had to deal with loads of dead bodies and relatives who themselves were traumatised. And had no training to deal with it.
There needs to be serious penalties for Labour councils who abuse their employees to stop others from doing the same thing.
It’s a shame for the taxpayers in West Kensington. But probably a relief for this woman that she can get treatment for the condition her job created.
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Mar 18, 2024 18:57:21 GMT
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 60,988
|
Post by mids on Mar 18, 2024 18:59:27 GMT
Hahaha, I thought you'd just made up "tragedy chanting". We really are doomed.
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Mar 18, 2024 19:09:05 GMT
Worse still - suspected tragedy chanting.
Oh, the humanity.
|
|
moggyonspeed
New Member
"Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat."
Posts: 7,670
|
Post by moggyonspeed on Mar 19, 2024 8:21:23 GMT
Tragedy chanting? Sheesh, I've heard of some made-up terms but this has to take the cake. Seriously, would not the Public Order Act 1986 suffice, which covers the offences of causing harassment, alarm or distress?
At this rate, it seems like half of Europe could be guilty of tragedy chanting for the foreseeable future, should the UK continually prop up the Eurovision points table.
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Mar 19, 2024 11:42:01 GMT
It’s a really weird thing to apparently be a criminal offence. But it’s also twattish to sing about Hillsborough or the Munich plane crash - the kind of thing that clubs should be banning fans for if they want a less vitriolic fan base. And trying to make the M62 match a bit less scummy would generally be a good thing.
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Mar 20, 2024 21:40:23 GMT
It's not quite April 1st, but .... "Teachers should be given a pay bonus to compensate for their inability to work from home and stop the rising numbers attracted away from the classroom for better working conditions elsewhere, according to a report. The research by the National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER) found that very few teachers in England were able to work remotely, putting them at a disadvantage compared with the nearly 50% of their peers in other graduate-level professions who say they regularly do. The report said politicians should introduce a “frontline workers pay premium” to compensate teachers and other public sector workers for what it called “the lack of remote and hybrid working opportunities in their jobs compared to the wider graduate labour market”." amp.theguardian.com/education/2024/mar/20/compensate-teachers-in-england-for-inability-to-work-from-home-report-saysExcellent trolling. I wonder if it crossed their minds that this scheme should be extended to actual front line workers, like infantryman or tankies, who also can't work from home. Also, if, as claimed, teachers work 36 hours each evening doing marking, they should be made to stay at school until it's done.
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Mar 21, 2024 8:43:32 GMT
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 60,988
|
Post by mids on Mar 21, 2024 9:01:20 GMT
Chick fight! I bet no one was hurt.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 60,988
|
Post by mids on Mar 21, 2024 9:16:04 GMT
Is she the up and coming Jordan? Will the far left start wondering about her tax bills and become enraged?
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Mar 21, 2024 10:14:21 GMT
I am concerned, naturally, about the tidiness of her lady-garden. I think we should be told.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 60,988
|
Post by mids on Mar 21, 2024 10:52:07 GMT
She really needs to move to Croydon.
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Mar 21, 2024 11:09:02 GMT
And not just because they have the eponymous hairstyle.
|
|
moggyonspeed
New Member
"Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat."
Posts: 7,670
|
Post by moggyonspeed on Mar 21, 2024 15:05:47 GMT
Hairstyle? Oh, you mean facelift. My bad. Sorry.
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Mar 21, 2024 15:22:40 GMT
It's known as The Croydon Face-lift
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Mar 21, 2024 19:12:17 GMT
Haha, you can read between the lines here .... "Scottish Parliament staff are no longer allowed to wear rainbow lanyards - or other accessories that show support for social movements - at Holyrood. All staff must now wear a generic purple lanyard with immediate effect. Claire Baker, an MSP who sits on the Scottish Parliament's Corporate Body (SPCB), announced the changes in the Holyrood chamber earlier. A parliament spokesperson said: "This decision will help minimise the risk of perceived bias." They added: "It will also help avoid any potential misperception over the absolute impartiality of all Scottish parliamentary staff." www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-68629616
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Mar 21, 2024 21:12:33 GMT
|
|