nobody
New Member
Posts: 8,733
|
Post by nobody on Aug 24, 2018 17:28:46 GMT
Latest on BBC is they died of natural causes
Now that does sound odd
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,065
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Aug 24, 2018 17:32:59 GMT
Suicide pact?It's hard to think how though as most poisons are pretty obvious and also a horrible way to die. CO is a possibility but you'd have to have some sort of apparatus that would be found. Can't think of any circumstances there'd be CO getting into the room if it's accidental. Near the kitchens? I wonder if the daughter's under suspicion? Putin? Corbyn? Were they Jewish? Blairite Labour councillors?
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Aug 24, 2018 18:08:28 GMT
Of course, the biggest mystery of all is why the fcuk you would choose to go on holiday anywhere with a minaret?
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,065
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Aug 24, 2018 18:16:21 GMT
Yeah, you don't hear of many people going on holiday to Leicester.
|
|
|
Post by wetkingcanute on Aug 24, 2018 19:08:06 GMT
Holiday sex game goes wrong? Historically, the practice of autoerotic asphyxiation has been documented since the early 17th century. It was first used as a treatment for erectile dysfunction.[5] The idea for this most likely came from subjects who were executed by hanging. Observers at public hangings noted that male victims developed an erection, sometimes remaining after death (a death erection), and occasionally ejaculated when being hanged. However, post-mortem ejaculation occurs in hanging victims after death because of disseminated muscle relaxation; this is a different mechanism from that sought by autoerotic asphyxiation practitioners.[citation needed]
Practice Various methods are used to achieve the level of oxygen depletion needed, such as a hanging, suffocation with a plastic bag over the head, self-strangulation such as with a ligature, gas or volatile solvents, chest compression, or some combination of these.[6] Sometimes, complicated devices are used to produce the desired effects.[7] The practice can be dangerous even if performed with care and has resulted in a significant number of accidental deaths. Uva (1995) writes “Estimates of the mortality rate of autoerotic asphyxia range from 250 to 1000 deaths per year in the United States.”[8] Cases have also been reported in Scandinavia[9] and Germany.[10][11] Autoerotic asphyxiation may often be mistaken for suicide, which is a major cause of death in teenagers.[12]
Accidental death See also: Autoerotic fatality Deaths often occur when the loss of consciousness caused by partial asphyxia leads to loss of control over the means of strangulation, resulting in continued asphyxia and death. While often asphyxiophilia is incorporated into sex with a partner, others enjoy this behaviour by themselves, making it potentially more difficult to get out of dangerous situations.[13]
In some fatality cases, the body of the asphyxiophilic individual is discovered naked or with genitalia in hand, with pornographic material or sex toys present, or with evidence of having orgasmed prior to death.[10] Bodies found at the scene of an accidental death often show evidence of other paraphilic activities,[14] such as fetishistic cross-dressing and masochism.[6] In cases involving teenagers at home, families may disturb the scene by "sanitizing" it, removing evidence of paraphilic activity. This can have the consequence of making the death appear to be a deliberate suicide, rather than an accident.[15]
The great majority of known erotic asphyxial deaths are male; among all known cases in Ontario and Alberta from 1974 to 1987, only one out of 117 cases was female.[6] Some individual cases of women with erotic asphyxia have been reported.[16][17][18][19] The main age of accidental death is mid-20s,[6][20] but deaths have been reported in adolescents[21][22][23] and in men in their 70s.[10][20]
Autoerotic asphyxiation has at times been incorrectly diagnosed as murder and especially so when a partner is present.[citation needed]
Lawyers and insurance companies have brought cases to the attention of clinicians because some life insurance claims are payable in the event of accidental death, but not suicide.[24][25][26]
|
|
|
Post by wetkingcanute on Aug 24, 2018 19:14:29 GMT
sorry - too pissed to edit Wikipedia!
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,065
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Aug 24, 2018 19:30:44 GMT
Interesting theory though. A cover up would save face all round too.
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Aug 24, 2018 19:43:19 GMT
sorry - too pissed to edit Wikipedia! Too short of O2, more like!
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Aug 25, 2018 18:52:04 GMT
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Sept 15, 2018 6:39:07 GMT
E. Coli.
Dodgy prawns win. That's what happens if you don't have CE marking, eh?
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Sept 15, 2018 6:41:26 GMT
"Former Nevermind The Buzzcocks host Mark Lamarr has been charged with common assault and false imprisonment, the Metropolitan Police has said." www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-45532153I bloody knew it! There had to be something dodgy about this bloke. The way he just disappeared off Buzzcocks.
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Sept 15, 2018 6:52:09 GMT
I was going to offer this up for wild speculation in the absence of any meat on the BBC news about this. In these circumstances the first port of call should always be the supersoarawaySun, who don't give a toss and are always happy to spill the beans. www.thesun.co.uk/news/7263119/mark-lamarr-arrested-charged-assaulting-former-girlfriend-prisoner/Of course, we can always speculate about what it was that made him leave Buzzcocks so precipitately. And why the BBC covered for him, of course.
|
|
nobody
New Member
Posts: 8,733
|
Post by nobody on Sept 15, 2018 6:57:11 GMT
Never liked him never thought he was funny.
And yes, The Sun is great for this sort of thing.
They love to build people up, then knock them down
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Sept 15, 2018 7:03:51 GMT
Their daily coverage of Katie Price is just odd.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,065
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Sept 15, 2018 12:22:53 GMT
So yet again the BBC cover up for a vicious predator? Time to close down the BBC.
|
|
flatandy
New Member
Posts: 44,452
Member is Online
|
Post by flatandy on Sept 15, 2018 13:16:45 GMT
Even if he wasn't a vicious predator, the fact that the BBC stuck such a talentless plonker on the air is enough to close them down.
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Sept 18, 2018 8:20:43 GMT
Interesting. www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-45556290A Russian ELINT aircraft disappears off the radar off the coast of Syria at the same time that the Isrealis have F-16s out doing some landscape gardening in Latakia province (surprisingly far north west.) Simultaneously, a French warship launched missiles. It has also been claimed that the Syrians shot it down in error. So, whodunnit? To my mind, the French navy are the most likely candidate, if only because a statement denying any involvement was issued by the French army. Well, yeah ….
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Sept 18, 2018 10:35:56 GMT
Russia says it was Israel wot dunnit.
Bloody anti-semites.
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Sept 18, 2018 10:55:19 GMT
No - new tack. The Syrians shot it down but only because those devious Israelis manipulated events in such a way that the Il-20 was in the wrong place at the wrong time.
It would have been a bloody good trick if that's what they pulled off but I think this was more cock-up than conspiracy as the Israelis have nothing to gain by killing Russians.
Oh, and where was the IFF here?
|
|
flatandy
New Member
Posts: 44,452
Member is Online
|
Post by flatandy on Sept 18, 2018 13:26:46 GMT
Syrians dunnit, but obvz it's not the fault of the Russian's friends, so it has to be someone else's fault and who better to blame than the Israelis. In an ideal world they'd have blamed the US or Ukraine, but as those are out Israel will have to do.
|
|