|
Post by flatandy on Jun 6, 2022 10:45:08 GMT
This seems to be on the wrong thread. Boris is a traitor, but this was about different traitors trying to desperately cling on to power. At the moment, unlike them, Boris isn’t yet trying to cling on through a coup d’etat.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 60,990
|
Post by mids on Jun 6, 2022 10:46:48 GMT
I see Starmer thinks some women have penises.
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Jun 6, 2022 10:52:53 GMT
His mum did. She had a massive cock, called Kier.
|
|
moggyonspeed
New Member
"Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat."
Posts: 7,670
|
Post by moggyonspeed on Jun 6, 2022 12:14:10 GMT
This seems to be on the wrong thread. Boris is a traitor, but this was about different traitors trying to desperately cling on to power. At the moment, unlike them, Boris isn’t yet trying to cling on through a coup d’etat. Really? Perhaps a modern coup d'etat doesn't necessarily mean the use of force, but instead seeks to tweak the Law in the sitting Government's favour. Take Boris Johnson's Elections Bill, which proposes the following ... - The Electoral Commission should lose its independence and should be subject to the Government of the day's whim "to guide the work of the commission"; what price independence then? - To introduce mandatory voter ID, thus further disenfranchising whole swathes of the electorate who are, historically, the least likely to turn out anyway. Then there's the draft Online Safety Bill which, if passed, would allow the government to similarly "guide" Ofcom in its regulation of the internet etc., giving Johnson et al the means of determining what we can do online; this, as we know, it could use to further undermine democracy. What about the Nationality & Borders Bill, giving the government the capacity to deprive individuals of their citizenship without notice? The UNHCR has gone on record to say that this is fundamentally at odds with the government’s own commitment in upholding the UK’s international obligations under the Refugee Convention. Or the Police, Crime, Sentencing & Courts Bill, giving the Home Secretary considerable extra powers e.g. to place conditions on the basic human right to protest and to exercise the right to freedom of assembly. This government introduced a number of sleight-of-hand measures to the bill once it had already passed through the Commons, thus limiting the usual Parliamentary scrutiny of these new proposals. Not to forget the Judicial Review & Courts Bill, the Subsidy Control Bill and the UK Internal Market Act, all of which could be used (and some already have) to further move the goalposts in Johnson's favour. Perhaps not your textbook coup d'etat, rather a sneakier version of it - in a "frog-boiling" kind of way.
|
|
|
Post by unclejunior on Jun 6, 2022 12:21:33 GMT
If Boris loses …. The runners & riders seem to be… Sunak Truss Patel Javid Hunt Hammond May Raab Hammond
….. with a guaranteed 12 month stretch before another confidence vote can be held.
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Jun 6, 2022 12:32:20 GMT
Patel's a non-starter.
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Jun 6, 2022 12:33:14 GMT
Hunt and Hammond are outsiders at best.
|
|
moggyonspeed
New Member
"Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat."
Posts: 7,670
|
Post by moggyonspeed on Jun 6, 2022 13:09:57 GMT
The 1922 Committee can review the 12-month rule. Graham Brady threatened Theresa May with this back in 2018/2019.
That said, I doubt whether this will work with Johnson, as he has an ego so big that you can see it from space.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 60,990
|
Post by mids on Jun 6, 2022 13:16:47 GMT
While we're on the subject of traitors, the BBC. Just sayin',
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Jun 6, 2022 13:24:48 GMT
I expect Johnson to survive, but have maybe 80 or 100 votes against him. The number would be enough to depose him in parliament but the Tories won’t do that. He will claim complete total victory and vindication. And then “leave on his own terms” in a few months.
I still suspect that Patel is the next leader.
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Jun 6, 2022 13:38:56 GMT
Apparently the very drunk Nadine Dorris’s tried to have a go at Jeremy Hunt on Twitter and managed to piss off loads of people to the extent that a few waverers seem to have moved into the no-confidence camp.
|
|
moggyonspeed
New Member
"Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat."
Posts: 7,670
|
Post by moggyonspeed on Jun 6, 2022 13:40:17 GMT
While we're on the subject of traitors, the BBC. Just sayin', Agreed. That footage of HMtQ and Paddington Bear reminded me SOOOO much of Guy Burgess and Kim Philby, with the footman doing a passable Donald Maclean.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 60,990
|
Post by mids on Jun 6, 2022 13:43:37 GMT
Or William Joyce. Britain haters the lot of 'em! Which reminds me, Ireush scum!
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Jun 6, 2022 13:45:44 GMT
On the subject of our undocumented immigrant from Peru, why is he meeting her maj and not being “processed” in Rwanda?
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Jun 6, 2022 13:46:47 GMT
Indefinite right to remain.
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Jun 6, 2022 13:49:45 GMT
People might have have had concerns about Paddington's youthful association with Sendero Luminoso but if there were any security concerns, Ma'am allayed them.
|
|
moggyonspeed
New Member
"Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat."
Posts: 7,670
|
Post by moggyonspeed on Jun 6, 2022 13:56:02 GMT
Agreed. "Deepest darkest Peru" my arse.
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Jun 6, 2022 14:00:04 GMT
I was going to say that he was undocumented but, we do know that he arrived with some paperwork.
|
|
|
Post by flatandy on Jun 6, 2022 14:02:00 GMT
I bet if he’d arrived at St Pancras or Ashford with that “documentation” he’d not be treated so kindly.
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Jun 6, 2022 14:08:10 GMT
He may well be trying to undermine our innovative jams industry.
|
|