|
Post by perrykneeham on Aug 27, 2023 16:13:42 GMT
Yeah, I felt there was an element of that. She's not alone. It's a bit knobbish and probably says more about them than you. It's fine to use the correct technical term if that's what you're familiar with, but not without easing it in, in a manner which doesn't patronise.
This is particularly jarring when it comes to abbreviations, acronyms or initials: always try to get the long form in first. We once went six months using a TES reference for vehicles without really knowing what it stood for (Theatre Entry Standard). Nobody felt they could ask.
|
|
flatandy
New Member
Posts: 44,452
Member is Online
|
Post by flatandy on Aug 27, 2023 20:59:17 GMT
On that note, any use of unnessessry technical language used to show inner knowlage or expertise when talking to those you know either don't understand or don't have the context. On that note - and I know I triggered the titrate that Baloo reasonably objects to - I want to reiterate my objection yet again to "calculus" used to not mean calculus. The US is particularly odious for going on about the "political calculus" and "this changes the political calculus" when they clearly mean the "political calculation" or, more rarely the actual "electoral calculation" using actual numbers. But it's absolutely never about derivatives and inflection points and dPolitics/dt. It is absolutely never calculus but the smug wankers writing about it want to make it seem more intelligent and more important than it actually is when it's really just adding up numbers.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,064
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Aug 28, 2023 10:55:51 GMT
"cis"
It seems that some loony extremists have taken a perfectly good prefix from physical chemistry and are now using it in their weird and creepy ideology to describe normal people.
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Aug 29, 2023 11:03:29 GMT
"cis" It seems that some loony extremists have taken a perfectly good prefix from physical chemistry and are now using it in their weird and creepy ideology to describe normal people. Mids is scared of dictionaries.
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Aug 29, 2023 11:04:37 GMT
People who say, when ordering in a restaurant or cafe, to the waiter " Can I Get" "Can I get a Fillet of Sole Veronique?" "Can I get a Tornado Rossini"? "Can I Get Beans on toast?" That seems fairly normal to me.
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Aug 29, 2023 11:08:55 GMT
<shocked>
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Aug 29, 2023 11:09:52 GMT
Well I am under 50 so. Maybe it was different among the previous generation.
|
|
moggyonspeed
New Member
"Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat."
Posts: 7,685
|
Post by moggyonspeed on Aug 29, 2023 13:15:38 GMT
On that note - and I know I triggered the titrate that Baloo reasonably objects to - I want to reiterate my objection yet again to "calculus" used to not mean calculus. The US is particularly odious for going on about the "political calculus" and "this changes the political calculus" when they clearly mean the "political calculation" or, more rarely the actual "electoral calculation" using actual numbers. But it's absolutely never about derivatives and inflection points and dPolitics/dt. It is absolutely never calculus but the smug wankers writing about it want to make it seem more intelligent and more important than it actually is when it's really just adding up numbers. Actually, calculus is used correctly in this modern political context. Sort of. Calculus in ancient Greek merely means pebble or small stone (from calx, stone) and such pebbles were used in counting votes in the Athenian ekklesía and that of other city states of the time. Granted, our modern-day concepts of differential-, integral- or multivariate calculus weren't even known or codified then in the sense that they are now, but the fundamental root is one of simple counting. Don't forget though that the Ancient Greeks lacked the counting numbers that we have today in spite of the undoubted skill of some of their mathematicians, so a simple means of accounting for votes was necessary - hence the calculus.
|
|
flatandy
New Member
Posts: 44,452
Member is Online
|
Post by flatandy on Aug 29, 2023 13:23:20 GMT
sh*t. Well, that's me told. Now you say it, of course "calc" is stone, so it makes sense. I'd just never known or thought about it.
So I am probably technically wrong.
But, to be clear, political journalists who use the term are still pompous twunts who want to seem smarter than they are.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,064
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Aug 29, 2023 14:25:41 GMT
It's still wanky while calculation is available.
|
|
|
Post by wetkingcanute on Aug 29, 2023 15:15:44 GMT
"Can I get a Fillet of Sole Veronique?"
"Can I get a Tornado Rossini"?
"Can I Get Beans on toast?"
Yes I realise it is because I am very old.
I was always taught that "Can I".. was to be used when asking if something is possible - eg. Can I jump that high or can I last this evening without a glass of wine?
Whereas "May I" was to be used when asking politely for something - eg. May I have the Avocado on toast please?
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,064
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Aug 29, 2023 15:17:51 GMT
Although both still work for erection.
|
|
|
Post by Repat Van on Aug 29, 2023 15:24:37 GMT
" Can I get a Fillet of Sole Veronique?"
"Can I get a Tornado Rossini"?
"Can I Get Beans on toast?"Yes I realise it is because I am very old. I was always taught that "Can I".. was to be used when asking if something is possible - eg. Can I jump that high or can I last this evening without a glass of wine? Whereas "May I" was to be used when asking politely for something - eg. May I have the Avocado on toast please? It’s definitely because you’re old!
|
|
flatandy
New Member
Posts: 44,452
Member is Online
|
Post by flatandy on Aug 29, 2023 15:27:55 GMT
Whereas "May I" was to be used when asking politely for something - eg. May I have the Avocado on toast please? "Yes you may. It's on the menu, of course you may have it. Do you think we'd put it on there and not allow you to have it? What kind of establishment do you think I'm running here?"
|
|
|
Post by wetkingcanute on Aug 29, 2023 15:40:11 GMT
"Yes you can. It's on the menu, of course you can have it. Do you think we'd put it on there and you're not able to have it? What kind of establishment do you think I'm running here?"
|
|
|
Post by wetkingcanute on Aug 29, 2023 18:00:17 GMT
sh*t. Well, that's me told. Now you say it, of course "May I" is so much better ~ it makes sense. I'd just never known or thought about it.
|
|
flatandy
New Member
Posts: 44,452
Member is Online
|
Post by flatandy on Aug 29, 2023 18:23:00 GMT
"May I have the rib eye, please, medium rare, with bearnaise, and make the chips extra crispy" makes no more sense than "Can I get the rib eye, please, medium rare, with bearnaise, and make the chips extra crispy"
|
|
|
Post by wetkingcanute on Aug 29, 2023 18:53:10 GMT
Oh I realise I'm not going to change things back.
My wife says "Can I have... a Porterhouse Steak as rare as it comes with chips."
I just prefer "May I have."
|
|
|
Post by perrykneeham on Sept 15, 2023 19:33:14 GMT
Community.
|
|
mids
New Member
Posts: 61,064
Member is Online
|
Post by mids on Sept 15, 2023 19:49:07 GMT
"Comooni'y."
|
|